Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
5 Westbourne Park Road - Copyright @Googlemaps2025 April2019
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond London's West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-FOUR:
Monday 31st of October 1960, at 5:30pm, the body of 53-year-old William Davies was found inside the top-floor flat of 5 Westbourne Park Road in Bayswater, London, W2. There was no sign of a break-in, no struggle and no obvious robbery. He was found on his knees, with a knife in his chest, and even though all the evidence pointed to this being a suicide, the police knew it wasn't.
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a black symbol of a 'P' just by the words 'Bayswater' off Paddington Station. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES: this is just a selection from various sources:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Westbourne Park Road in Bayswater, W2; one street north of the suicide pact of Barbara Shuttleworth’s unrequited lover, one street west of the old lady killer, two streets north-west of the fake SAS initiation, and one street south of the cat pate - coming soon to Murder Mile. At 5 Westbourne Park Road stands a three-storey brown-bricked Georgian terrace. As is typical in this area, it has pretentious white doric columns on either side of the door as if an ancestor of Julius Caesar lives there, when it’s probably a corporate lawyer called Farquar, his Russian dial-a-bride whose name looks like someone fell on a keyboard, their two sons Tarquin & Fortesque, a daughter called Avocado Plum Cake, and they all have their own scooter rack, briefcase tree, humus maker and S&M dungeon. Back in the 1960s, being more of a rundown area, this was a slightly better than average lodging house, where – it was said, using a parlance of its day –some of the lodgers were of an “artistic persuasion”. With homosexuality still illegal and punishable by a fine or some prison time, this was considered a safe space for its residents, one of whom was a 54-year-old openly gay butler called William Davies. With his life having taken a tragic turn over the two years prior, William had grown despondent with what his existence had become and seeing no happiness in his future, he took his own life. And yet, a small (and almost insignificant) detail told a bigger picture; one of greed, lies, and (possibly) murder. My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 284: Dead Man’s Hand. Monday 31st of October 1960, as dusk broke and the evening set in, the casual murmur of communal living echoed inside of 5 Westbourne Park Road. Owned by the landlord Ernest Kyffin, in the basement and ground floor lived Ms Margaret Morris with her best friends Ken Tylisen & actor David Hart, the first floor was split into two for Mr & Mrs Fermie and Mr & Mrs Perrin, on the second lived William’s sister Annie (only that week she was on holiday), and the small attic flat was occupied by William. Being about 5:30pm, the tenants were coming home, checking their post, popping the TV’s and radios on, and Ken’s dog barked excitedly as the house filled with the smells of cooked meat and potatoes. It had been an ordinary weekend as everybody went about their business in this pleasant little house where they all looked out for one another. It was typically quiet, as they all respected each other’s privacy, they were never any issues and as he always did, Mr Perrin had popped a half pint of milk and the Sunday papers on the second floor landing for William… only 36 hours later, they were still there. At 5:35pm, as he had been unwell and was going through a rough patch, being a good neighbour, Mrs Perrin and the landlord climbed the stairs up to the attic to check that he was okay. Nothing raised their suspicions; the landing light was on, but then it often was; the single window was shut, but the night were cold; and the bedroom door was open, which is how William often left it when he was in. With the light off, the only illumination was an orange glow from the gas heater which cast a shadow across the bed, it being empty except for the bedsheets and pillows piled up. In the dark, William was nowhere to be seen, but then having switched on the light, they froze at the tragic sight before them. PC Hudson arrived at 5:40pm to secure the scene, and at 6pm, Doctor Roughton certified him as dead. As was standard procedure in any suicide, a detective was called in to establish the facts, in this case, it was DI Walters. As an experienced officer, the scene was a familiar one; with no signs of a break-in, no marks suggesting a struggle, nothing obviously stolen and with none of the tenants having seen or heard anything usual in the last 36 hours, it was likely that the perpetrator of this crime was William. Beside the bed, lay two glass tumblers and a cup; one had a brown liquid in it said to be ale bought as an off-sale from a pub hours before his death, one had water in which he’d used to take two headache tablets (the empty Aspro packet on the bedside table), and the only fingerprints found were William’s. Witnesses state that at the bars he visited that night – The Prince Albert, The Oak, The Three Bells, The Redan and the Carmalite Club where (as an openly gay man) he was known – his blue overcoat, grey suit and waistcoat he had draped over the armchair, his beret and bowtie was on the dresser, and still wearing a green pullover, no underpants but a pair of cord under trousers, the police report states “this is a type of clothing a person who indulges in perversion would wear”, meaning anal sex. As expected from a gay man who often bought men home, the sheets and pillows had been arranged, as the police report states “to assist in some form of gross indecency”, but with no cuts or bruises to his body, on initial inspection, either the sex was loving and consensual, or it hadn’t taken place. A while later, William had slipped on his brown suede shoes as if he was planning to escort that night’s date out of the flat, and as heard by several of the tenants, the man then calmly left of his own accord. Nowhere in the room was a suicide note found, but then with his head clouded by grief, it’s unlikely he was thinking of others in his final moments alive. Standing alone, the evidence showed that with a six-inch sheath knife in his right hand, he had plunged it two inches deep into his left lung and with the blood dripping vertically and not one drop anywhere else as he didn’t flee or stagger, having pulled the blade out of his chest, he slumped to his knees where he was found, his arm and head on the bed. By the time his body was discovered, rigor mortis was complete and he hadn’t been moved. The Police report states that “it was suggested that this was a case of suicide”, that a lonely gay man wracked with grief and despair had tragically killed himself, possibly after one last rejection of a potential lover. But what had driven him to take his own life? Born on 2nd of February 1906 near Port Talbot in Wales, William Davies was one of five siblings raised in the mining town of Cwmafan. Being thick with belching chimneys and the clank of industry, as a delicate boy who enjoyed reading and hated that everything he touched was caked in a layer of coal dust, he knew he wasn’t built to be a labourer or a miner, and sought out a place he would fit in. Educated to a decent level, although at least one sister and a brother were teachers, William did his bit for King & Country by serving in the Army during World War Two, but for the bulk of his career, he worked in hotels as a silver service waiter, and later became a prestigious butler at Fishmongers Hall, Buckingham Palace and five months before his death, he was a butler at Princess Margaret’s wedding. Said to be easy going, cheerful and sociable, everyone agreed he was chatty and fun, but 1958 was a bad year for William, and although he painted on a smile, it saw the start of his downfall. With his asthma getting worse and his lungs so weak he sometimes struggled to walk, he was forced to live on benefits, and with a feeling of shame, his sister had to pay his rent and gifted him a weekly allowance. Those who knew him said he was quiet and pleasant; the shopkeepers said “he was a good customer”, across most pubs in Paddington they said “he drank, but never caused any trouble”, he had only one criminal conviction being the theft of an Easter Egg to give to his sister, he had a small pocket of close friends and no enemies, and although by 1960 it was still illegal to be a homosexual in Britain, he was openly gay, he flaunted his flamboyance, and he was well known on the gay scene as ‘Bert the Queer’. For several years, William had lived with an older gentleman, a grey-haired well-dressed civil servant called Percy Sellers, they lived together in a flat off Westbourne Park Road with his sister Annie, and the two men lived happily as a couple. Percy was his love, his life and his everything, but in 1958, at the delicate age of 71, Percy died suddenly, leaving William alone, but also broken and distraught. He was lonely, tired, sick and in the quiet of his room, he often got depressed. His autopsy, conducted by Dr Francis Camps, confirmed “the blade penetrated the upper lobe of left lung causing massive haemorrhage… it was consistent with the knife and its subsequent withdrawal”. Asked if it could have been an accident, Dr Camps stated “it’s almost impossible to have been caused by falling upon the knife unless in some grossly abnormal posture. Further, had the full weight of the man’s body fallen upon this knife, penetration would certainly have been greater”. With scarring due to asthma on his lungs, it was confirmed that this had hastened his death, which took barely a minute. On the surface, it looked like a regular suicide... …yet the truth was lying in the dead man’s hand. The man who had visited William’s flat that night was 21-year-old Istvan Szabo, a Hungarian refugee. Born in Tallya, a small village 35 miles north of the capital on the 13th of February 1939, he was raised in poverty and conflict as the Second World War loomed on the horizon. With Hungary having sided with the Axis Powers (Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy & Japan), even before he was able to speak, Szabo’s country was chaotic, as in 1944 they unsuccessfully tried to switch sides to join the Allies, they suffered under the Soviets and the establishment of the People's Republic in 1949 lead to the Hungarian uprising in 1956, which culminated in Soviet tanks invading and the Hungarian people fought back. Leaving school aged 12, he aided his father in running their small farm and although he was a labourer at the stone quarry, the uprising gave him a reason and an opportunity to flee. Alone, aged 17, Szabo entered England as a refugee on 12th of January 1957 (about the time that William’s lover died) and billeted at Butlins Holiday Camp in Skegness, he was registered as an alien on the 20th of October 1959. He had no family, no friends, he spoke modest English, and for the two years he was here, he struggled. Based on his record, he tried hold down several jobs – as a labourer in Deepcar, as a miner at the New Monkton Colliery in Barnsley, as a machinist at a textile factory in Preston, all short term jobs for small pay – but being immature and lacking intelligence, he also got several small convictions for wounding, twice taking a car without permission, the theft of some food and the forging a postal order for £2. He was hardly a big time gangster, but a silly mistake by this stupid boy would change both their lives. In October 1959, having moved to London, this should have been the fresh start he needed, only once again he treated life like it was game. Across the next year, he had three jobs (as a labourer, a servant and a kitchen porter) which he lost or left in quick succession, he served six months in prison for theft, and upon release began working as a packer at an office furniture company earning just £9 per week. As far as we know, Szabo didn’t know William, and they were as different as chalk and cheese. William was an immaculately-dressed poetry-loving butler who was polite, quiet and caring. Szabo was a thick-set uncouth youth with a crew-cut, who was grubby, rowdy and rough looking, and in an impenetrable Hungarian accent, he tried to speak like an East End gangster, only this always came off as laughable. Besides, set aside their 33-year age difference, and everybody knew that William was gay. He wasn’t only openly gay, he was flamboyantly gay, and yet, as a lad who it was said ‘liked the girls’, Szabo was raised under homophobic laws of the Soviets, so it doesn’t make sense that they would ever meet… …but they did. Saturday 29th of October 1960. At 1:45pm, William waved goodbye to his sister Annie at Paddington station as she headed off for a week to see her family in Port Talbot. With no real plans that weekend, William met his pal, Janie Irons outside her flat, and sat in their usual seats at the Three Bells Club. Drinking a half pint in each pub, such as The Redan, The Prince Albert and The Oak, they were said to be merry, and Janie recalled “William looked as if he was expecting to meet someone”, but never did. “He never said who this person was, but he was often on his own and would happily talk to anyone”. With ‘last orders’ called at 10:30pm, they headed back to Janie’s flat to watch the telly until shutdown at 11:25pm, he was said to be as chatty as always and expressed no grief or gripes, and (although the evidence suggests he ended his life that night), he made plans to meet Janie for lunch the next day. At 11:30pm, as he regularly did, he headed a few doors down to the Carmalite Club at 57 Westbourne Grove, a gay-friendly member’s club where he was known and liked. He signed in as ‘Mr Sellers’, the name he used when his beloved Percy was still alive and this was their nightly hangout, but after 30 minutes, he told Reginald Rice, the owner “I’ve had enough to drink. I’m going home to bed”. He was wearing the clothes he died in, he was alone, he was in a good mood, and no-one followed him out. Those details were corroborated by multiple independent witnesses, yet although he was seen and heard arriving home at 12:20am, that seven minute walk took him almost triple the time. But why? The only eyewitness to the missing minutes was Szabo, who Janie (William’s closest friend) confirmed she had never met before, and neither had his sister Annie, or the tenants who he lived with. Szabo would claim “I was going home from Praed Street to St Stephen’s Gardens”, a route which goes along Westbourne Park Road, “and this bloke followed me. I couldn’t get rid of him. I tried going fast, but he started running after me”. William wasn’t known to be predatory, but he was lonely and drunk. Szabo would later claim “It was midnight, he catch me, he say good evening, he ask me ‘what about a drink’ as he have no-one to keep him company”, and being a statement so speckled with inaccuracies that it ignores that fact that William was more than double Szabo’s age and had asthma so bad that running was almost impossible, that Szabo did drink, and although the police report states “there is little doubt that they went there for the purposes of indulging in homosexuality but what transpired in the room will never be known”, if Szabo wasn’t gay, why did he willingly enter a gay man’s flat? At exactly 12:20am, they entered 5 Westbourne Park Road. We know that, as hearing the door, Ken’s dog started barking at the stranger, and coming out of the ground floor bathroom, both Ken and David stood just inches away from William and Szabo, at which William introduced him as “my friend”. They went up to the attic flat, the door was locked behind them, and none of the tenants heard a sound. According to Szabo, they both had a glass of ale, and once this was drank, William suddenly turned. “He went down on his knees and pulled my zip off. He says to show him my body. I told him I won’t”. The boy said he was terrified as the older man kissed his neck, “he says I have nothing to worry about if I do what he says”. Szabo tried to flee, “but he took the key. He says sit down. He started to undress and he told me to do the same. Then I told him I won’t do it”. It was then that William pulled out the knife. “He say he like me very much. He say he kill me if I do not. And as he lift his hand”, in a stabbing striking motion, “I grab his wrist, twist the knife round and kicked him with my knee in the bollocks”. In Szabo’s own words, he was defending himself from being raped by a predator, but as William fell with the knife in his hand, ”he fell on the bed and the knife run in deep in his chest. He tried to get up but he couldn’t. I seen the knife was in his hand. I got frightened, I was scared to death, I ran”. That was his statement, and although entirely possible, it was littered with mistakes. They arrived at 12:20am, the attempted assault supposedly occurred after one drink, but as Margaret on the ground floor heard Szabo calmly leaving (not running) at 2am, what happened in those missing 90 minutes? He said William fell on the blade, but the autopsy states this was impossible. The bed was disarranged “with the pillows placed to assist some form of indecency” as the police report says, but if Szabo had fled before any assault by William took place, why were faint bruises and scratches found on William’s body but not Szabo’s, why was William missing £3 that his sister had given him, why was William’s anus dilated consistent with anal sex and why did a swab test on it prove positive for semen? It can never be proven to be Szabo’s, but if William was a rapist, how did he get Szabo to violate him? Initially, the only fingerprints found in the room and on the drinking glasses were William’s, but later finding a partial print on a bottle, we know he wiped his prints off everything he touched, but missed that. There also didn’t seem to have been a robbery as the room looked neat, so (although he claimed he was in panic) he tidied up, and took a cigarette case, brown leather gloves and a leather note case. At the time that William’s body was found, Szabo bragged to his lodger “I had a fight and stabbed a bloke”, stating with glee details only the killer would know, “I struck him in the left breast. He fell to his knees gurgling and blood came out of his mouth and nose”, and eerily mirroring the autopsy’s assumption, “I put his gloves on, pulled the knife out, wiped the fingerprints off and stuck it back in his dirty hand” as if he had stabbed himself. When the lodger asked “what was his name?”, Szabo replied “William Davies”. Only, that Sunday night, this supposed suicide hadn’t been reported in the papers and he claimed he didn’t knew William’s name, as in his statement as he only called him ‘the bloke’. As for the knife, none of William’s friends or family recall him owning one, but when Janos Puskop, a colleague of Szabo’s was questioned, he stated that Szabo owned an identical sheath knife engraved with the maker mark of ‘William Rogers’, having been threatened with it just three days prior. On Wednesday 2nd of November 1960, with the ‘supposed suicide’ now confirmed as ‘a murder’ and the newspapers stating that police were seeking a man matching Szabo’s description, armed with his woefully flimsy alibi, he gave himself up to PC Victor Ridge who was on duty in St Stephen’s Gardens. Taken to Notting Hill Police station, he repeated to Inspector Walters “I don’t know this man. I have never seen him before”, but he still gave himself time to brag “he came at me with a knife. I blocked his arm. I have done a bit of judo. He fell on to the bed. I saw blood. I got up and ran for my life”. At 5:30pm, he gave a voluntary statement, but by 9:40pm, they had charged him with murder. For the police and the pathologist, at first glance “it was suggested that this was a case of suicide”, but they both knew that it wasn’t. Upon his arrest, William’s lodging was searched, and along with the possessions he had stolen, he had recently burned some letters on the fire (their contents impossible to determine), blood was found on his jacket sleeves which he had hastily tried to sponge-off (only that wouldn’t have been there if he hadn’t touched the knife as his statement claims), and he also had a key ring with 14 keys on it; one for his room, one for the front door, one for his bike, several for his work, and one for the street door at 5 Westbourne Park Road, and one for the door of William’s flat. Any killer who had mistakenly taken a key would have thrown it away, but he had them on a keyring? And of course, the final piece of the puzzle was the clue he had left in the dead man’s hand. Although inexperienced in the ways of murder, Szabo had done almost everything right; popping on William’s leather gloves (later found in Szabo’s lodging caked with blood), he used a hankie to wipe off his prints (which he later burned), he pulled the blade from William’s chest (and having seen which hand William smoked with) and placed the knife into his right hand as if he had stabbed himself. It was nearly perfect. The problem was, the blade was facing the wrong way. (End) It was a simple mistake which he could only have known if he had stopped and thought about it. If William had stabbed himself in his chest, the tip of the blade would be facing towards him, not away. Quickly ushered from coroner’s Court to committal at Marylebone Police Court, with such a wealth of evidence against him and the investigation needing only a few loose ends tied up, the trial was held at the Old Bailey on the 12th of December 1960, barely six weeks later, before Mr Justice Thesiger. Pleading ‘not guilty’ to the charge of murder but guilty of robbery, across three days the jury carefully considered the evidence, and yet it didn’t take long for them to come to a conclusion. Guilty of non-capital murder, as they didn’t feel it was premeditated and aggravating circumstances suggested that they were uncertain whether William had lured Szabo to the flat and had attempted to assault him. On the 23rd of December 1960, Istvan Szabo was sentenced to life in prison as the death penalty could not be considered, and with at least 15 years to be served, the judge decreed “should you be released, I recommend you be deported to the country you came from”. With his name being common and shared with a famous Hungarian film director of that era, it is likely he returned home, but uncertain. The trial answered one question, ‘did Szabo kill William’, but why he did it will never be known. If it was a robbery, was William a chance encounter, a planned target, and if so, did Szabo use himself as gay bait for an elderly drunk? And if this was a failed sexual assault, why (if they did) did the men have what resembled consensual sex? It’s a mystery lost in the midst of time, which might have ended up as a ‘death by suicide’, had he not left a seemingly insignificant detail in the dead man’s hand. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of.
0 Comments
Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast - #283: The Vice Girl Killer - Part 3 of 3 (Justin Martin Clarke)5/2/2025
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
Noke Lane where Paul Milburn's murder took place @googlemaps April2019
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond London's West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-THREE:
On the weekend of the 24th and 25th of January 1987, two sex-workers vanished from two street (Sussex Gardens and Cleveland Terrace) near to Paddington Station. With their beaten, strangled and mutilated bodies found barely 24 hours apart in places where they didn't belong. The police quickly confirmed that a crazed killer was on the loose. But still unsolved today, it remains one of the most perplexing unsolved double murders in Britain. But who was he? MURDER ONE:
SOURCES: a selection sourced from the news archives:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Wednesday 15th of July 1987, on the last day of the inquest into the murder of Racheal Applewhaite, using his full diplomatic immunity, the police’s primary suspect flew to the safety of Mexico. But having ruled out both cases being linked, Detective Superintendent Jim Hutchinson stated “Guillermo Suarez was no longer suspected in the murder of Marina Monti”, ruling out a spree, a serial, or a lone killer. It's a brutal occupation where some of the most vulnerable women face dangers every night, whether robbery, assault and rape, with sex workers the second most likely demographic to be murdered. Both killings had all the hallmarks of most prostitute murders being attacked by either a punter or pimp, but with every similarity highlighted and every difference dismissed, the fact that two men had chosen that date and place to murder two sex workers in a seemingly identical way was entirely coincidental. Before Guillermo had fled, police were already investigating another suspect in Marina’s murder, stating before the coroner “we believe we know who her killer is, we just can’t prove it”. In their eyes, he knew the West End, he had probably worked as a pimp or drug-pusher in Bayswater, had a history of theft, assault and violence against women especially sex-workers, and was dangerous and unstable. While police and the press mistakenly believed that both murders were connected and that therefore Guillermo must also be the murderer of Marina Monti, that gave her real killer his chance to flee. But who was he? Sources list him by several of his aliases, whether Mark Mellor, Justin Maher-Clarke or Martin Anthony Maher, but in truth, born in Birkenhead near Liverpool in 1956, his real name was Justin Martin Clarke. Few details exist about his early life – his upbringing, his schooling, or why he turned to crime – but what became clear was that Clarke was angry, erratic, selfish and cruel. Everything he did was to suit himself, and with no empathy, other people were merely there to be used, abused and discarded. Said to be six foot tall, well built with broad shoulders and (what was later described as) “mad staring eyes” like Hannibal Lector, it’s unsurprising that he was a bouncer in Merseyside’s roughest nightclubs. But what made him stand out, beyond his gruff demeanour was his accent; strong Liverpudlian with a odd twang of South African, but rapid fired in a high-pitch staccato as if ever word was a red hot bullet. Growing up in a hostel, he began his criminality in his teens, and first gained notoriety under the alias of Martin Maher, when in 1977, aged 21, he was convicted of two burglaries, stealing a TV, jewellery worth £6000, and many irreplaceable heirlooms, leaving both homeowners traumatised. Unwilling to aid the police, he was found guilty and sentenced to two years in prison, but he barely served one. In 1978, as he often did when things got hot, he fled the country. Where he went is uncertain, but we know he joined the French Foreign Legion; a military unit which accepts men from any nation willing to fight for France (which Clarke was, as although he didn’t give two hoots about the French, he loved a good scrap) with the criteria being you had to be young, fit, and with no ‘serious’ criminal record. With the training said to be physically and psychologically punishing, he quickly became adept at hand-to-hand combat, weapons training, survival, urban warfare, interrogation, and escape and evasion. He was trained to fight and to kill, and with his only mission ‘to survive’, he was a fearless brutal soldier. Where he fought is unknown, as in the FFL, anonymity is guaranteed (it own diplomatic immunity), but although in the late 70s and early 80s, the Legion were engaged in bloody conflicts like the Battle of Kolwezi (in the DRC) and in Chad for Operation Tacaud 4 and Operation Sparrowhawk, his accent suggests he had served in South Africa, where they trained the South African National Defence Force. It was the perfect job for a violent man with no compassion, as he learned to hurt others and bend them to his will, and skilled in torture and strangulation, he befriended bad men who ran trafficked women in brothels and kept their girls in check with daily beatings, as well as sadistic mercenaries of a similar psychotic mindset, alongside gun smugglers, drug runners, fascists, warlords and terrorists. By the early 1980s, Clarke returned to the UK, although what year is uncertain, as well as why? It is unknown whether he served the full five years, or if he was arrested or kicked out for war-crimes. But again, possibly having fled when things got hot, London is where he made the most of his ‘new skills’… …as a violent West End pimp. Again, his movements were impossible to pin down as he used so many aliases to disguise his nefarious income. Often, Justin Clarke would state he was just a ‘security guard’ in a Bayswater hotel, when in truth, he was an enforcer for sex traffickers and - it is said - he ran (what was euphemistically called) an ‘escort agency’ which was in reality a low-rent brothel where many girls lived in fear of his wrath. We know he commanded the red-light districts of Bayswater, Notting Hill and Paddington, especially the pick-up spots like Sussex Gardens and Cleveland Terrace, he was feared by the girls who he forced into sex-work, they paid him protection money, and were violently assaulted if they didn’t, or worse. Whether he knew Racheal and Marina can never be confirmed, but it is likely, just as we can never be certain whether both girls were friends or strangers. And yet, we can get a brief glimpse at his life in London based on the type of crimes he was awaiting trial for in 1987, the year of the double murder. In 1983, he deceived the Chartered Trust insurance company out of £3500. Between August 1985 and March 1986, he lived off the immoral earnings of a 20-year-old prostitute from West Kensington who - it is said - “worked for his escort agency”, in August 1985 he coerced or forced another teenage girl into sex-work, in November 1986 he caused the Actual Bodily Harm of prostitute Madelaine Greydon who – again – he had violently beaten and strangled, and on the 15th of January 1987, just one week before both murders, he sadistically beat and robbed prostitute Joann Flynn for the sake of just £20. These were not out-liars in his criminal career, these were the crimes the police had enough evidence to charge him with – and given how rare it is for prostitutes to willingly face their pimp in a court of law, knowing that regardless of the outcome, they would be beaten, disfigured or killed in revenge - his assaults on the prostitutes who were forced to work for him were likely to be frequent and vicious. Which begs the question; was this why Marina Monti was so eager to meet that unidentified man on All Saint’s Road at 11pm, as although she’d cashed a £240 benefits cheque, she needed another £50? Did she know him, did she fear him, or did he find her first and drive her to Mitre Bridge? Across the weekend of Saturday 24th of January 1987 when Marina Monti was murdered and Monday 26th when the body of Racheal Applewhaite was discovered, we have no idea where Justin Clarke was. There was no known evidence of what he was doing, whether he was in Bayswater, Shepherd’s Bush or Kensington, or even if he drove or owned a small light-coloured car, possibly an orange Mini. But one thing we know for certain is that on the day both murders were reported… …as he often did when things got too hot, Justin Clarke fled the country. Like so many elements of these two murders, this could have been a coincidence, as awaiting trial for fraud, ABH and pimping, maybe he was fearful of serving another stint in prison? Or maybe, knowing that murder carries a life sentence, the only place he felt safe was 8000 miles away in South Africa. Entering illegally, under an alias, 31-year-old Justin Clarke hunkered down in the notorious Hillbrow area of Johannesburg, a crime-ridden den of inner-city squalor awash with drugs, sex and death. Again, claiming to be a ‘security guard’ in (what was conveniently) the red light district, he stuck out like a sore thumb being tall and solidly built with glaring eyes, and a voice like he was having a sneezing fit. As one of the Met’ Police’s usual suspects, having been arrested on an illegal immigration warrant, on the 24th of March, three weeks after Guillermo Suarez was released, two detectives escorted Clarke back to the UK, where they reported “he is being questioned about other attacks on prostitutes”. But again, maybe this was just another coincidence? On Friday 3rd of April 1987, although he proved hostile throughout, questioned at Kensington Police station by the same detectives who had quizzed Guillermo Suarez, he later re-appeared at Horseferry Road Court having been charged with fraud, ABH and pimping, as well as the murder of Marina Monti. Held at Brixton Prison, Justin Martin Clarke was tried at Southwark Crown Court on Wednesday 19th of August 1987, just four days after the inquest. On the charge of robbery, as the victim was too afraid to testify, that case was dropped; the fraud was rescinded owing to a lack of evidence, both assaults could not be proven, and with his defence counsel stating “he has always denied committing the murder and any other offence, although he believes the police are convinced he is guilty of murder”… …that day, Justin Clarke walked free. It’s an unsettling thought, but had the police and the press not been so insistent that – being desperate to find a connection linking these two coincidental murders to Guillermo, or a spree or serial killer –this might not have given Clarke enough time to destroy any proof of his guilt, if indeed he was guilty, as with two inquests and one criminal trial having failed, maybe the police were clutching at straws? After the trial, like any innocent man would do, he got on with living an honest life. Said to have moved to Hendon in leafy north-west London, in December 1991, he married Androulla Pallikarou, a Greek lawyer who specialised in wills, probates and residential properties, and that year as a mature student, he began studying law at the University of Luton specialising in Tort law (which deals with civil wrongs). With no known arrests over the next six years and none of his aliases appearing in any newspapers, he didn’t flee the country, he didn’t hastily change his address, and he didn’t frequent his old haunts in Bayswater. In April 1993, after half a decade of freedom, he was a married man who was taking his exams in a degree which could positively impact his life and lead to peace, happiness and harmony… …only crime was always a part of his life, especially killing. As a side hustle, even amidst the peace of St Alban’s, Clarke remained in the shadows of criminality, we know this as he was later charged with supplying class B drugs, and with two associates equally as keen to cheat and steal, they began perpetrating several frauds in which they targeted drug-dealers. The scam was simple; having purchased several kilos of paraffin wax from an arts & crafts shop, they boiled it down on the kitchen hob, added a brown dye, set it using thin baking trays into half kilo bars, added a gold seal to each (taken from boxes of Ferrero Rocher chocolates), sprinkled them with coffee granules and wrapped these nine bars in cling film, so they’d look like £23,000 worth of cannabis resin. As a selfish conman with no empathy, it’s unsurprising that Clarke’s insane brain had spawned this kind of caper, given that he would beat up a prostitute for the last £20 in her purse, or even worse. His victim was Paul Anthony Milburn, a 42-year-old self-employed builder and father of two, who was renovating his semi-detached home on Sunbury Lane in Walton on Thames following his divorce. He wasn’t a big-time drug dealer, as he only did it to when he needed to and he was short on quick cash. On Monday 26th of April 1993 at 3pm, Paul borrowed a pal’s black B-reg Saab 900 turbo, and with a friend nicknamed ‘Ginge’ beside him, they drove 33 miles from his home to a pre-arranged spot at the car park of the Little Chef at Chiswell Green, a roadside eatery off the North Circular at St Alban’s. While families sat eating their Jubilee pancakes, Paul’s Saab pulled up, he saw the two dealers he knew and the four men politely chatted. Clarke was nowhere to be seen, as knowing that Paul didn’t like or trust him, the deal would be off if that psychotic scouser was spotted, having scammed Paul before. Besides, that day, he had been “talking incoherently” and even his own associates didn’t trust him. At a little after 4:20pm, having agreed to buy nine bars of what he thought was cannabis for £2250 a bar, the two cars headed off in convoy to a secluded location where the deal could take place, far away from any cameras, police cars and prying eyes. Barely half a mile south-west, they drove up Noke Lane, a quiet agricultural rabbit-run surrounded by high hedges, long fields and a smattering of farms. The day was bright and clear, and the lane was quiet and isolated, as both cars pulled up, one behind the other. Keeping the mood light with a bit of cheeky banter and blokey football chat, the dealers discretely moved the nine half-kilo bars into the boot of the Saab, and with the deal done, Paul reached into the glovebox to pull out the slightly-discounted £18000 in used notes he’d agreed to pay for it. The scam was done, Paul was unaware that the drugs were fake, and the money was inches away. For the sake of the deal, Clarke had agreed to stay out of the way… …but being the epitome of unstable, from the bushes, he burst out brandishing a US Army .45 calibre pistol, as he ran towards the Saab. Terrified, Paul’s pal ‘Ginge’ fled across the open fields for his life as this thick set ex-soldier ran screaming towards them with his wild staring eyes, but as he frantically tried to start the engine, it was as Paul hunkered down that Clarke slammed his fist into the window. Making a hand-sized hole which showered Paul in shards of glass, it was as the Saab’s engine roared and tried to pull away that Clarke ran alongside it, the wheels mounting on a grass verge as the tyres slipped losing traction. Paul was alone, defenceless and afraid, but it was as Clarke shoved the pistol through the hole, that from inches away, he fired once, and slumping forward, the car ran into a hedge. Entering his right shoulder at point blank range, the bullet passed through his upper ribs, both lungs, his heart, it disabled both arms, and as several massive haemorrhages from all his vital organs flooded his weakening chest with blood, it embedded into the passenger’s seat, as within seconds, Paul lay dead. Diving into his associates’ car, Clarke shouted “Drive or I'll put one in your f**king head”, as the car sped away, leaving behind a fleeing witness, a dead body, the fake drugs, £18,000 and his own blood. It was all for nothing, but his deranged desire to kill. With the Saab blocking the lane, the body was found minutes later by a mother doing the school-run. Detectives initially stated “it did not appear to be a professional killing”, as the scene was awash with evidence like the bullet, glass fragments, foot marks, fingerprints and bloodstains, and coupled with advances in DNA profiling, whoever this killer was, the Police had the evidence to arrest and convict. On the 12th of May 1993, two weeks later, one of the dealers was arrested in Worcester Park. Charged with conspiring to supply drugs, as a result of his questioning, he gave a name - Justin Martin Clarke. Launching one of Britain’s biggest manhunts, police searched Birkenhead, London, Ireland and offered a £10,000 reward for information on BBC’s Crimewatch and ITV’s CrimeNet alongside his name, details and a photo, with the public warned “he’s armed, extremely dangerous and not to be approached”. Having driven south to the county of Kent, as he crossed Dartford Bridge, Clarke threw the bullet casing into the River Thames, but – like a coldblooded coward - as he always did when things got hot… …he fled the country. Hopping a late-night ferry from Dover to Calais, he hid-out in Paris, re-associating himself with his old comrades from the French Foreign Legion. The Police tried to track him and his aliases, and knowing that this “dangerous fugitive” had connections to the IRA, the FFL, the SANDF and Islamic terror cells in the Middle East, the British Government issued an International Arrest Warrant. The net was closing in on him, but with Bosnia & Herzegovina not being part of The EU, they didn’t receive the warrant. Across the 1980s and early 1990s, the former Yugoslavia was a country in chaos, torn apart by inter-ethnic wars, political corruption and genocide. With many militia groups needing experienced soldiers who’d fight for a wage and would kill without question, it was a great place for a sadistic killer to hide. Clarke enlisted in the Army of the Republic of Bosnia & Herzegovina, where although he was regarded as a bully, a drunk and a womaniser, far from the ramifications of a war-crimes trials, he was praised for his brutal and aggressive fighting which earned him the nickname of ‘The Truck’. He served for so long, that in 2007, aged 51, he was given Croatian citizenship and qualified for a full military pension. But evil will always be evil. Semi-retiring to the coastal village of Baska, although he had married a local girl, had a son and seemed to be living an ordinary life as “a security guard at the hotel Dubravka”, working as a criminal enforcer for a warlord and kingpin, he smuggled arms and drugs, he blackmailed officials, he took whatever he felt was his, and threatened locals at gunpoint by bragging “I could kill you with a fucking phone call". Between 1995 and 2007, although he had repeatedly terrorised the town into a state of fear, Clarke was arrested at least five times by Croatian police, but with powerful men in his pocket, his crimes were dismissed by the State Attorney, and not once were the British authorities told that he was there. Clarke was feared, especially because being a violent drunk with no morals, he loved bragging about those he had hurt, claiming “I was questioned by the police in 1987 about a woman I’d murdered”. If he had murdered Marina Monti, he wasn’t grief stricken, as to him this was a badge of honour. Had he lived an ordinary life, he could have remained hidden in Croatia until today, but as always, his arrogance took a step too far. In 2007, finally arrested for the assault of municipal commissioner Jeka Rošcic, with the authorities closing in, when things got hot, he fled, leaving behind his wife and child. Flying to Qatar in 2007 under a forged passport, Clarke got work as a minder for the Saudi royal family, he was hired as a security expert for the Qatar-arm of international engineering firm, ‘Konstruktor’ and across that year, he was living in a self-built fortified camp in the desert surrounded by concubines. But even here, his luck was running out, as the selfish psychopath left a slew of enemies in his wake. Following a tip-off, the Met’ Police flew two detectives out to interview staff at the engineering firm, as Qatar was a country where the international arrest warrant was valid. Only having been forewarned by the one friend he had left, they missed him by minutes, as grabbing a worker’s passport, he fled. Again, Clarke had vanished, this time heading to Hungary, and there they lost him. Every year since, the police issued a new appeal to find him, refusing to give up in the hunt for this dangerous fugitive, but every year he seemed to vanish further and further into obscurity, until he made a simple mistake. 29 years after the murder of Marina Monti, and 23 years after the killing of Paul Milburn, Justin Clarke sent a letter to his 81-year-old mother in Henley-on-Thames, and the Police intercepted that mail. Aided by the German authorities, on Thursday 4th of February 2016, a six-foot scouser with a strange accent was arrested in Berlin and extradited to Britain. In his possession was a Dutch ID card in the name of Michael Anderson, but his fingerprints were a perfect match to Justin Martin Clarke. As was his method, he refused to co-operate giving only “no comment” answers, but the Major Crime Unit of Beds, Herts & Bucks Police who had tracked him, knew they had the evidence to convict him. Tried at Woolwich Crown Court on 15th of January 2018 before judge Sir Peter Openshaw, he refused to have a lawyer present and – from his cell in HMP Bellmarsh – he pleaded ‘not guilty’ to conspiracy to defraud and the supply a Class B drug, possession of a firearm and the murder of Paul Milburn. Found guilty, on the 2nd of February 2018, 62-year-old Justin Clarke was given a life sentence meaning he must serve a minimum of 25 years in prison, and won’t be considered for parole until he’s 87. (End) A violent unstable psychopath was off the streets for good, but what remains uncertain is whether it was him who murdered Marina Monti? With no witnesses nor fingerprints, in 1996, her murder was 1 of 32 cold cases the CID were re-examining with advances in DNA profiling, later extended to 220, but it proved inconclusive, and again, those 220 cases didn’t include Racheal Applewhaite’s murder, as they knew they had the right suspect, but evidence and diplomatic immunity had thwarted them. As of today, 38 years later, the murders of Racheal Applewhaite & Marina Monti remain unsolved. With the questioning derailed by the press and the investigation stymied by a belief that this had to be a spree or serial killer - akin to Jack the Ripper - rather than (what it was) a series of coincidences, we may never know why these women were killed, maybe a robbery, hatred, a debt, or a cruel sadist? With Guillermo Suarez and Justin Clarke claiming their innocence, we can never be certain whether Guillermo killed Racheal and Justin killed Marina, if one of them killed both girls, or with both men seen as likely suspects, did this give an alibi to the real killer who got away with murder, twice? The one thing we do know is that had these women been diplomats or politician’s wives, they would have been treated better by the press, the public, and their outcome may have been a very different story. With Marina cremated in Hendon on 7th August of 1987 and Rachel in Kensington & Chelsea 12 days later, sadly the identity of the Vice Girl Killer remains a mystery that both women took to their graves. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of. Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast - #282: The Vice Girl Killer - Part 2 of 3 (Racheal Applewhaite)28/1/2025
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
entrance to Sydney Close, SW3 @Googlemap Sept2023
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond London's West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-TWO: On the weekend of the 24th and 25th of January 1987, two sex-workers vanished from two street (Sussex Gardens and Cleveland Terrace) near to Paddington Station. With their beaten, strangled and mutilated bodies found barely 24 hours apart in places where they didn't belong. The police quickly confirmed that a crazed killer was on the loose. But still unsolved today, it remains one of the most perplexing unsolved double murders in Britain. But who was he? MURDER TWO:
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a red symbol of a 'P' just by the words 'Bayswater' off Paddington Station. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES: a selection sourced from the news archives:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Sunday 25th of January 1987 at 9:30pm, around the time that the body of Marina Monti lay on a cold hard slab in Kensington mortuary awaiting a post-mortem, Rachael Applewhaite and an unidentified ‘olive skinned’ male entered The King's Head pub, just two streets south of the red light districts of Sussex Gardens, Cleveland Terrace and Paddington Station, where she was often picked up by punters. Said to be “so drunk she couldn’t walk”, several eyewitnesses (including a friend Deborah Mezen, and several customers and bar-staff) confirmed that she wasn’t wearing her usual clothes – a black jumper, a blue denim skirt and blue shin-length denim boots – being a fashionable look for the era. Instead, she wore a second-hand navy-blue and purple hotel maid’s outfit made from hard-wearing polyester, which being a Size 12, looked like embarrassing hand-me-down as Racheal was barely a Size 10. The uniform wasn’t hers, her own clothes were missing, the white plastic bag she was carrying wasn’t big enough to hold them, and she hadn’t been back to her flat, where her boyfriend Ian was waiting. This could have been a mildly memorable moment in any pub, but it made the last official sighting of Racheal all the more credible, as she had argued and fought with Deborah who had mocked her outfit. Asked to leave just shy of ‘last orders’, she left with the man, who was said to be sober, and witnesses state that he drove her away in a small, possibly light coloured car, its make and reg number unknown. Murdered hours later, that sighting posed three big questions: if this was a pre-meditated attack by a pimp, a drug dealer or a spree-killer with a hatred of sex workers akin to the Yorkshire Ripper, why was she taken to a pub where she was known and dressed in a way which drew attention to her? Why did he allow his face to be seen? And if he had lashed out in a pre-sex rage, why did he murder her? Four days later, having autopsied both bodies, the detectives confirmed “we feel that both cases are linked” and the work of “a very violent man”, as there were too many similarities to be coincidental. Both women were a similar age, weight and size being barely five foot tall, they were sex workers for four years, they worked the same streets with possibly the same pimp, and they might have known each other as they picked up clients a couple of hundred yards apart, but that’s all that connects them. They vanished without a trace, their last client owned a small (possibly light coloured) car, and their bodies were found dumped miles from where they were last seen and in a place they didn’t belong. Both women were strangled with the ligature – a belt or tie – but never were found, both were beaten about the face and head but there were no obvious defensive wounds, there was no sexual assault, no proof they’d been robbed, and in some items of clothing were missing, in both cases, their boots. But there was one difference between both murders… …Racheal’s was much more savage. Monday 26th of January 1987. South Kensington. Two miles south of the pub where Racheal was last seen, a resident living in the affluent Sumner Place was returning from a weekend away. Driving down the busy A308 Fulham Road, she pulled up at a gap between a café and a dress shop, she opened the unlocked wrought iron gates and drove into a private area known as Sydney Close. It’s a place you would only know if you were one of twenty residents who parked their cars in these private garages. Arriving a little after midday, being cramped and surrounded on all sides by the backs of four and five storey Victorian terraced houses, even on the brightest days the sun struggles to reach the floor, but at night, being unlit, it is only illuminated by the odd bedroom window and the occasional headlight. Like the layby at Mitre Bridge junction, the killer had chosen a location which was isolated and dark. At the rear of 30-31 Sumner Place, the resident didn’t need to unlock her garage as she never used it for storage, but as the green steel door rose up, at the back corner, her headlights illuminated what she described as “a bundle of rags” - a phrase identical to the security guard who’d found Marina’s body - as her eyes were drawn to the bare pale legs of a small woman curled-up in the foetal position. The police arrived within minutes and the scene was sealed off. As before, the body looked as if it had been dumped from a car, but this time the killer had reversed in so it wouldn’t be seen by the flats overlooking it. With no signs of a struggle or any bloodstains, that proved she had been murdered elsewhere and driven her in the boot of the car. And with it being a frostless night, the tyre marks were illegible, but the axel width suggested they were from a small car. As with Marina, Racheal’s boots were missing (and were never to be found), and with her feet being bare but not dirty, she had removed them herself but hadn’t walked there. So why had he kept them? Her clothes were the same purple and blue hotel maid’s outfit she was seen wearing in the pub just hours before, but with no traces of mud, dirt or oil, she must have been killed inside a room or a car and was only taken outside when her killer carried her out, only now they were badly bloodstained. Like Marina, Racheal had been beaten about the head and face until she was rendered unconscious. With a ligature, she had been strangled from in-front as this defenceless woman lay limp and helpless. But although Marina’s injuries were limited, upon Racheal’s legs and face were the bruised imprints of a man’s Size 7 or 8 boot, as he repeatedly stamped on her body, breaking her nose, cheek and teeth. And yet, he hadn’t stopped there. Detective Sergeant Jim Hutchinson described Racheal’s injuries as “frenzied and horrific… two or more instruments were used to batter her about the head and face”, one of them believed to be either a wrench or a tyre-iron, stating “and we cannot rule out a chainsaw”. This wasn’t a killing in panic, as either someone truly hated her or didn’t want the body to be identified. That differentiated the killings, but was Marina’s mutilation cut short? One theory quickly dismissed was mistaken identity as Racheal had mousey brown hair and Marina’s was black. Another was a vengeful drug-dealer, only Racheal’s vice was drink. And although the press tried to attribute it to a copy-cat, that was impossible, as the first murder wasn’t reported until the second body was found. The autopsy was conducted by pathologist Dr Iain West who said it was impossible to pin down an accurate time of death as the body had been moved from a warm interior, to a slightly chilly car with its heating intermittently on, and into a cold and damp garage on a night barely above freezing. As an estimate, rigor mortis stated she had died eight to ten hours before she was found, so between 2am and 4am, but owing to the haemorrhaging she had suffered, she wasn’t dead when she was dumped. Having been subjected to horrifying injuries (using feet, fists and several tools) while she was still alive, she had lain there - unconscious and possibly paralysed - inside the closed garage in an isolated area that very few people knew about or would pass, bleeding and barely able to breathe, as she lay dying. Her killing was almost certainly committed a man without any compassion, someone who could kill at will, who had a history of physical assaults on women and sex-workers, who they trusted as neither woman was abducted, and with no empathy, he saw prostitutes as someone to be used and discarded. With such levels of violence, the police suspected he was likely to be a man was who unstable… …but who was he? With no witnesses to her murder, no clue as to where she was killed, no sighting of the car which had dumped her, and no idea who the ‘olive skinned’ man in the ski jacket she was last seen with in the pub was (or even if he had murdered her), detectives had to rely on the limited evidence they had. With her bag nowhere to be found, a positive ID was made by her boyfriend Ian who had reported her missing. Questioned over their disappearances, Racheal & Marina’s boyfriends remained as suspects as many men were, but with alibis and witnesses to prove their innocence, they were eliminated. All the usual suspects were rounded up – pimps, punters, perverts, addicts and prowlers, as well as the former owner of an illicit escort agency in Bayswater who lived off the earnings of prostitutes and was questioned over the assault of others – but there didn’t seem to be a suspect who stood out. Racheal’s murder was as mysterious as Marina’s, but what baffled detectives most was the purple and blue polyester uniform she was wearing for no known reason. When examined, the blouse’s label confirmed it was made by Warren Petites, a manufacturer of uniforms to the hotel and catering trade which were sold in shops and via mail-order. It wasn’t unique enough to identify who had bought it and it was the type used by mid-range boutique hotels across London, but also Britain and Europe. It wasn’t Racheal’s as it was a size too big and the arms creased in the wrong place, but faintly written in pen on the label, months if not years earlier, someone had scrawled in permanent marker ‘P Suarez’. It was faded from numerous washes, and although police suspected that this was its original owner, they were unable to find a ‘P Suarez’ missing from any local hotels, or any uniforms reported stolen. If her killer was a pervert who took pleasure in stealing his victims boots and in one case, dressed her up a like hotel maid, the Police warned others that “this terribly dangerous killer could strike again”. With no witnesses to her death and her timings a mystery, although said to be passive and quiet, the only likely suspect in her killing was the man that Racheal was last seen alive with. On Thursday 5th of February, barely a week after her body was found, Police issued a Photofit of him. It was a risk as if he was the killer, it could cause him to go into hiding or flee, but they desperately needed to find him. Blessed with reliable witnesses, each article stated “Police want to speak to a man of continental, maybe Greek or Arabic appearance, 5ft 9in, 35-40, hair black with specks of grey, wearing gold rimmed glasses and maybe a ski jacket, and on his left finger of his left hand was a large gold medallion ring”. Sadly, it failed to give them the leads they needed, so on Thursday 26th of February, detectives broadcast an appeal on the BBC’s Crimewatch, a successful TV show which drew in 14 million viewers. At this point, he was only a witness who police believed had information vital to the case - and having televised a recreation of her last sighting in the King’s Head pub, the unusual uniform she was wearing, where and how her body was found, and accompanied by a description and the Photofit of the man - police at the murder incident room took a few hundred calls from friends, associates and witnesses… …one of whom was the man himself. Watching TV, recognising the girl and seeing his own face staring back at him, that night, having first called his wife in Mexico, two days after its broadcast, 42 year old Guillermo Suarez walked into Kensington police station where detectives were shocked at how perfectly he matched the Photofit. Guillermo Suarez was an administrative attaché at the Mexican embassy in West Kensington, roughly half way between the street where Racheal was picked up by her punters and his third floor flat at the exclusive Coleherne Court in South Kensington, which – coincidentally – was barely half a mile west of the garage where Rachael’s body was found. He also was the owner of a small light-coloured car. When questioned, he confirmed that he was with Racheal in the pub that night, that he’d picked her up for the purposes of sex, and that the maid’s uniform belonged to his wife who – although in Mexico – sometimes visited him in London and worked at various hotels. Initially he denied leaving the pub with Racheal, but when confronted with witness testimony, he changed his story, and stated that after they left the pub, he drove them back to his flat, where in his wife’s wardrobe “she took a fancy to it”. This made no sense, as the uniform was unfashionable, uncomfortable, her denim skirt, boots and black jumper were nowhere to be seen, and it was the wrong size, so much so it was laughable. Asked if he dressed her up as part of a sexual fetish, he refused to answer the question as he feared it might incriminate him, with detectives later stating that “we don’t know what happened to her own clothes, nor do we have a satisfactory explanation as to why she wanted to take this new set”. Police said “he had offered himself as a witness of his own accord” and was treated accordingly, as a witness. But that night, always eager for the latest scoop, even though he hadn’t been charged with any crimes, the Daily Mirror and the Daily Mail – two tabloids famed for printing incorrect information, then days or weeks later in a barely visible column hidden inside where no one would read it issuing a retraction of their accusations – having already incorrectly listed his name as Jose and his job as a ‘Top Envoy’ when he was little more than a middle ranking administrator, they printed his details and a photo beside the headline of ‘I am TV Murder Suspect’, which in the public’s eyes made him as good as guilty. Details of the case had been leaked, possibly by a bent copper willing to blab for some cash to a sleazy hack, and - of course – they only printed the most sensational details, which derailed the questioning. Having admitted to paying Racheal £20 and having sex with her in his flat in and around the time that the pathologist said she had been viciously attacked which led to her death, detectives were later able to confront him with the evidence that witnesses had positively identified him as the man last seen with the victim, and that between the 31st of January and the 7th of February, one week after both murders were reported, Theresa Mellett, the manageress of a dry-cleaners a few streets from his flat identified him as a man who had “taken in a bag of bedding that was soiled with blood. He told me his wife had an accident”, but when the police checked, his wife in Mexico hadn’t visited him for months. The evidence was circumstantial, but Police later confirmed “although he had offered himself up as a witness, as a result he was arrested”. Guillermo Suarez was locked up for 1 ½ hours and questioned for 30 hours, but on the 1st of March, as they couldn’t charge him, he was de-arrested and released. Forensic tests were carried out on his car and his flat, but they were unable to prove whether Racheal was there or if this was where she had been murdered, and fearing another leak of information to the tabloid press, it was never reported what make of car he had, or if his boot prints matched those which had stamped on Racheal’s face. On Monday 23rd of March, Guillermo Suarez was interviewed a second time by detectives, this time about the double murder of Racheal Applewhaite and Marina Monti… … but again, lacking conclusive evidence, he was released without charge. Many questions we will never know the answer to, as after this point, the information fed to the press dried up; we’ll never know what he said happened to Racheal after they had sex, whether he knew of or had been to the garage in Sydney Close, whether he owned the orange Mini which picked Racheal up earlier that night, whether he took prostitutes to the layby at Mitre Bridge, whether had sex with Marina at the Lion Court Hotel, or if any of his fingerprints or items containing his DNA were found. In both murders, police said, he was the most likely suspect, but then a force more powerful than the police took control of the investigation, as although not high ranking Suarez was entitled to protection. Granted by the 1961 Geneva Convention, diplomatic immunity offers a degree of legal protection to the diplomats, their families and staff from criminal and some civil prosecution. Designed to prevent international incidents between governments whose relations may be strained, it ensures that a blind eye is turned to minor crimes like speeding or drink driving, but with rape, manslaughter or murder, if the diplomat is charged, they would be ‘expected’ to waive their immunity, but this is not a given. In 1986, one year before, 39 criminal offences were committed in the UK in which diplomatic immunity was used, including a US diplomat’s husband who was charged with the sexual assault of a child. When Suarez was arrested, it was reported “the Mexican charge d'affaires in London was summoned to the Foreign Office where he was told that the British expected the Mexican authorities to waive his protection”, but instead aided by the Mexican Ambassador, he refused to answer further questions. And like most people in powerful places their influential friends sought to protect them. On Monday 2nd of March, one day after his release, several MPs asked for the Home Secretary Douglas Hurd to mount an investigation “into the appalling way the Met Police treated this Mexican diplomat”, with none of them expressing remorse at how two women had been murdered at the hands of a maniac. On the 1st of July 1987, an inquest into the murder of Racheal Applewhaite was held at Hammersmith Coroner’s Court, as presided by Dr Paul Knappman. Having waived his diplomatic immunity, instead Suarez chose not to answer any questions for fear they may incriminate him, and with this meaning he couldn’t and wouldn’t say anything, at that point, the inquest couldn’t proceed with that charge. By the time the Director of Public Prosecutions had re-examined the case, without enough evidence to re-arrest him, using his diplomatic immunity, Suarez flew back to Mexico, where he was safe… …and there he remains, even today. John Folkes, Racheal’s father stated “I want him to come back to Britain and tell the police what he knows. It makes me sick that he has rebuilt his life in Mexico… I bet Suarez has a big house and plenty of money, all the things my Racheal dreamed of but never had and now never will”. Tracked down by the Daily Mirror one year later, it was true, he was living in a nice house in Mexico City with his wife and two children, and having left the embassy, he worked for the Epsom Computer Printing Company. Again, he refused to answer any questions, instead stating “I was innocent and simply trying to help. It's case closed as far as I am concerned”. Frustrated, Detective Superintendent Hutchinson’s reply was “the case is still open and I would like to ask Mr Suarez a number of vital questions”, but owing to a lack of conclusive evidence, the Crown Prosecution Service could not extradite him from Mexico. And that is where the case into the murder of Racheal Applewhaite remains… …unsolved, but with a very likely suspect whose guilt cannot be proven. On 13th of August 1987, at the inquest into the murder of Marina Monti, having previously stated that “we feel that both cases are linked” and the work of “a very violent man”, DS Hutchinson would confirm “I have now ruled out any link that the killings of Rachel Applewhaite and Marina Monti were connected”, stating that “Guillermo Suarez was no longer suspected of killing Marina”, only Racheal. There was no serial or spree-killer akin to the Yorkshire Ripper stalking the streets of Bayswater. There was no double murder of two seemingly associated prostitutes just streets apart. And although it was believed there were too many similarities for the murders to be coincidental – the time, the place, the small car, the ligature, the beatings, the lost clothes, the vanished handbags and the missing boots - that’s exactly what they were, two coincidental murders, but by two very different killers. (End) As of 2024, 37 years after the murders of Racheal Applewhaite & Marina Monti, they remain unsolved. With no new witnesses nor evidence, it’s a cold case which only gets colder. In 1997, Marina’s murder was one of 32 cold cases the Met’ Police re-investigated, but that didn’t include Racheal’s, as with the only suspect in her killing living in Mexico, that case would only be solved when Suarez is extradited. At the inquest into Marina Monti’s murder, DS Hutchingson’s claim that the murders weren’t connected didn’t come out of no-where, as before the coroner, Dr John Burton, he stated “we believe we know who her killer is, we just can’t prove it”, as having also extricated another man, he said “the Crown Prosecution Service feels there is insufficient evidence to charge him, but inquiries continue”. In the initial stages of their investigation, knowing the area well, all the usual suspects were rounded up; whether pimps, punters, perverts, addicts or prowlers, as well as one primary suspect who drew their attention. Said to be unstable, volatile and with a long history of violence against women, he was the former owner of an illicit escort agency in Bayswater who lived off the earnings of prostitutes and was questioned over the brutal assault of West End sex workers, who were left traumatised for life. As a robber, a pimp and a drug dealer who is currently incarcerated for a horrific murder, suspected of others and some say could even be a serial killer, just days after Marina’s murder – for no reason at all – he adopted several aliases, fled the country and went into hiding. But did he kill Marina Monti? The final part of The Vice Girl Killer concludes next week. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of. Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast - #281: The Vice Girl Killer - Part 1 of 3 (Marina Monti)21/1/2025 
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
Sussex Gardens in Paddington, where Marina Monti was picked up - copyright @Wikicommons
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond London's West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-ONE:
On the weekend of the 24th and 25th of January 1987, two sex-workers vanished from two street (Sussex Gardens and Cleveland Terrace) near to Paddington Station. With their beaten, strangled and mutilated bodies found barely 24 hours apart in places where they didn't belong. The police quickly confirmed that a crazed killer was on the loose. But still unsolved today, it remains one of the most perplexing unsolved double murders in Britain. But who was he? MURDER ONE:
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a red symbol of a 'P' just by the words 'Bayswater' off Paddington Station. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES: a selection sourced from the news archives:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Sussex Gardens in Paddington, W2; the street where Doris Jouanette became the Blackout Ripper’s last victim, where Agnes Walsh was brutalised by the ‘sad faced killer’, where Ruby Bolton, Sharon Pickles and Kathleen Moloney picked up punters, and where Amanda Walker was last seen before being mutilated by the sadistic ‘Honey Monster’ - coming soon to Murder Mile. As a busy tree-lined street just south of Paddington Station, by day Sussex Gardens is a peaceful row of cheap B&Bs, but by night, it’s a one stop shop for the drug addled and the sexually desperate. With cars pulling up on every corner to greet a shivering wreck in a mini skirt and fish-net tights, having bartered a price for her pussy, what follows is either grunting in a doorway or a head bobbing in a bush as their feet dodge heroin needles like a spiky assault course and crack addicts straining to shit. It may seem like a nightmare, but as we’ve seen many times before, this is a place where (for more than a century) destitute women have traded their bodies to bad men - some of whom end up dead. On the weekend of the 24th and 25th of January 1987, two sex-workers vanished from these streets just south of Paddington Station. With their beaten, strangled and mutilated bodies found barely 24 hours apart, the police quickly confirmed that a crazed killer was on the loose. But who was he? My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 281: The Vice Girl Killer – Part One. As with most cases involving prostitutes, many witnesses refused to give evidence for fear of perjuring themselves, so much of their lives remain as mysterious as the motive for these senseless killings. Born in Edmonton, North London on the 13th of September 1959, Marina Alexandra Monti was one of at least two daughters to Froukje Poelstra, a native of Limburg in the Netherlands who had lived in the Yemen prior to coming to England, and Angelo Monti, a man of Italian heritage. As a petite pale-skinned girl with deep blue eyes and dark black hair, she had the exotic look of both of her parents. Little is known about her upbringing; where she went to school, where she lived, or what her parents did. It was said she had married a man called Neil Carter, but there was no proof that she ever wed. Across the sixties, seventies and most of the eighties, Marina didn’t make many (if any) ripples in life, as with few documents and nothing in any papers, it’s as if she didn’t exist, and soon she wouldn’t. By the turn of 1987, Britain was in a wintery slump; unemployment was high, the pound was weak, AIDS was that decade’s deadly pandemic, several massacres (the King’s Cross fire & Hungerford) were brewing, we were months away from the Black Monday financial crash, and in the second week of January, the Big Freeze had blanketed parts of the UK in 30 inches of snow, with the rest cold and icy. These dark cold streets mirrored Marina’s life, as with her family having left England for warmer climes (later moving to Australia), except for her on-and-off boyfriend, 27-year-old Marina was on her own. For several years, Marina had scraped together a basic living by selling sex on the streets, in recent weeks she’d begun living in a shabby DHSS hostel at the Shelbourne Hotel in Kensington (where 25 years before, Churchill’s forgotten super spy Krystina Skarbek was murdered), and with at least one conviction for soliciting, unable to hold down a legitimate job with a regular wage, she wasn’t only trapped in a vicious circle of poverty due to her past but because she was hopelessly hooked on heroin. Saturday 24th of January 1987 was a bitterly cold night as Marina walked the icy streets of Bayswater and Queensway. Dressed in red knee-length boots which matched her lipstick, and carrying a white shoulder bag (full of all her essentials, like make-up, a hair brush, underwear, condoms, her purse, tin foil and a lighter to cook up her drugs), although petite and pretty, with the streets being so deathly quiet on this hellishly frozen night, she couldn’t be as choosy about which punter she’d have sex with. At the back of the Bayswater tube station, from 9pm to 10pm, Marina earned £30 having satisfied an unnamed punter in The Lion Court Hotel at 26 Prince’s Square, a disreputable hotel where you could rent a bed by the hour. With a solid alibi, he said she had told him “I gotta go, I gotta get my stuff”, by which she possibly meant her heroin fix, and said “I gotta be in All Saints Road and need £50 by 11pm”. She left a little after 10pm, but never said who she was meeting, or why she had to do it by that hour. That was her last confirmed sighting. But who was she meeting? Was it a dealer who she owed money to, a pimp who she was afraid of, or someone who had threatened to kill her, and (possibly) others? If it was to buy drugs, it seems odd as she’d cashed-in a benefits cheque for £240 (roughly £350) that day, and even though her and her boyfriend both had an £80-a-day habit, she didn’t go to All Saints Road to score any heroin. So having not got high since that morning, her withdrawal was kicking in. Across her final hour alive, the flu-like withdrawal symptoms had taken hold of her body; her muscles ached, her stomach twisted, even amidst the frozen air she sweated with a red hot fever, and feeling sick, irritable, anxious and depressed, all she could think off was drugs, which clouded her judgement. By 10:30pm, having travelled in the opposite direction to Sussex Gardens, two miles south-east of All Saints Road, an anonymous prostitute stated she saw Marina touting for business, her red boots, white bag and red lipstick making her stand out. She spoke to no-one, she didn’t seem distressed, and at sometime between 10:45pm and 10:50pm, an unknown punter in an unseen car picked her up… …and there she vanished. Nobody saw her leave Paddington, nobody heard them drive along the Bayswater Road to Shepherd’s Bush, nobody sensed anything suspicious as they headed up Wood Lane, past Wormwood Scrubs prison and its desolate scrubland, and just shy of a defunct stretch of the Grand Union canal, this small car turned right into an isolated unlit layby used by truckers, work-crews and prostitutes. Not wanting to be seen by the police, it was a perfect spot as the sound of sex is muffled by a steady slew of trains heading east and west, and with no houses nearby, neither party would be arrested for lewd conduct. At a little after 11pm, around the time that Marina had planned to meet a man in All Saints Road, over Scrubs Lane and just shy of the Iron Bridge, a signalman working the nightshift at the Mitre Bridge junction box – an elevated cabin beside the railway, where he pulled levers to change the signals and redirect trains onto different lines - spotted the headlights of a car from roughly 150 feet away. Being dark, he couldn’t tell its make or colour, but he knew why it was there having witnessed this before. With the car’s inside light off, he saw nothing. Because of the trains, he heard nothing. And with this small two or four door car parked up for just four or five minutes, he suspected nothing was wrong as it drove away. He continued his nightshift, ate his sandwiches, and thought nothing more about it… …and yet, the Vice Girl Killer had made his first kill. At 7:15pm, 40 minutes before dawn, a security guard at the Scrubs Lane railway depot spotted what he described as “a bundle of rags in the layby”. Shimmering in his torchlight, this tiny tragic lump was covered in a light dusting of frost having been dumped at least six hours before, but it was as his torch shined lower, that it illuminated the bare pale legs of a small woman curled-up in the foetal position. With rigor mortis two-thirds complete, detectives determined she had died between 9pm and 11pm. Found in a familiar layby, the initial investigation stated it was likely that this unidentified women was a prostitute who had been driven here for the purposes of sex, and although the press said she was partially clothed, she hadn’t been stripped or sexually assaulted, as being found without any knickers, this was common in the sex trade as it speeds up the sexual transaction, as time (literally) is money. The same was said about her dark-red knee-length boots. Her feet were bare but clean when she was found proving that she hadn’t walked there or got out of the car, and as prostitutes often remove their shoes as this makes it easier to have sex in cars, the Police believed she’d been killed just before the sex. But for some reason - known only to the killer himself - he had taken with him, her red sexy boots. With her white shoulder bag missing, it was suspected that this was a robbery, but although she had cashed a £240 benefits cheque, it was impossible to tell if she had spent it, lost it, or he had stolen it. What was known was the method of her death. In the darkness of the car, he had brutally beaten her about the face, breaking her nose, fracturing an eye socket and leaving her features a bloody swollen mess, and with an unidentified ligature - said to be either a tie or a stocking - he had strangled her. As with the boots and bag, having squeezed every last breath out of her, he took the ligature and left nothing behind to identify him; no footprints, no fingerprints, no semen and no hairs. The small car (whose make and colour was impossible to tell, as on a moonless night even whites can look black) had left a few tyre marks, but after a night of drizzle and a top layer of frost, they were barely legible. For the Police, this seemed like the familiar killing of a prostitute by a punter… …but had the Vice Girl Killer already moved onto his second kill? Just 7 years after the Yorkshire Ripper, 45 years after the Blackout Ripper, 51 years after the Soho Strangler and almost exactly a century after Jack the Ripper had terrorised Whitechapel, a serial-killer of sex-workers still haunted the memories of every citizen and detective. Every time a sex-worker was found slain, it made them ask “is this a new ripper?”, as although improbable, it was always possible. Because of those killings and the frequency of which sex-workers are assaulted or raped by drunks or a slew of sad men seeking someone to blame for their own failings, sex workers often work in pairs or bring their pimp or boyfriend along should the client get rough. But they can’t always be there. The second murdered girl was 24-year-old Rachael Applewhaite. Born on the 7th of February 1963 in Gloucestershire to a loving father, mother and sister, it was said that Racheal Ann Folkes (as she was christened) had a solid and loving upbringing being raised in a hard-working lower-middle class family. Later moving to the West Oxfordshire district of Carterton, although little is known about her early life, it wasn’t burdened by trauma or tragedy, and unlike Marina, she hadn’t been abandoned by her loved ones. She was educated, she had worked, and – aged 19 - although she believed she was madly in love with a man called Grantley Applewhaite in Autumn 1981, sadly their marriage didn’t last a year. By the end of 1982, she had left home. She wasn’t a runaway as she had nothing to run from, but with her village being a too quiet for this ambitious teenager, she headed to the bright lights of London. As a big city with lots of thrills and danger, it could have been the making of her, but within the year, ending up homeless, penniless and depressed, 20-year-old Racheal was earning a living on the streets. No-one sets out to sell their body for sex, but as a lone girl who drowned her sadness with drink, she made use of what life had given her just to survive. Being mousey blonde with hazel eyes and a petite Size 10 frame, she would have known that her girlish looks would attract men, and in turn, she’d live. Between 1983 and 1987, for four years, Racheal Applewhaite barely existed, except in a few mugshots having been convicted of soliciting, her weekly signature when she cashed in her dole cheque, and at the check-in for her DHSS hostel in Earls Court where she lived with her boyfriend, not far from Marina. They weren’t friends, but some said they knew each other. It’s uncertain if they knew each other’s name, but as young women who worked on the same unlit streets, faced the same dangers, maybe had the same pimp, and probably picked up the same punters, they may have warned each other of the men to look out for. Their connection may have been merely a quick nod in passing, or perhaps they didn’t know each other at all, but they could never know that they’d be linked in a tragic fate. Saturday 24th of January 1987, the same bitterly cold day that Marina was murdered, Racheal was in her DHSS hostel, with her 20-year-old boyfriend Ian. They’d been together for just six months, but the honeymoon was over, as too often being broke, they spent their meagre earnings on alcohol. The press said Racheal was a heroin addict, but this was wrong, as unlike Marina, drink was her demon. That day, she received no calls, no visitors, she didn’t seem usually upset and she had no-one to meet. That evening, on a small black and white television, Ian & Racheal watched BBC One. At 5:20pm was US sitcom Perfect Strangers, at 5:45pm was the now-problematic kids TV show Jim’ll Fix It, and as the fluffy British sitcom Hi-De-Hi started at 6:20pm, Racheal got changed into a black jumper, a blue denim skirt and blue shin-length denim boots. Escorted by Ian, they walked to Earls Court tube station and caught the District Line tube to Paddington, where she plied her trade just shy of this bustling station. Just three streets south and almost identical to Sussex Gardens, Cleveland Terrace is another street where – even today – punters pick up prostitutes and shabby little rooms can be rented by the hour. Standing on the eastern edge of Cleveland Terrace near to the station, it was a perfect spot being busy but discrete, opposite the Prince of Wales pub and nearby to a raft of unlit car parks, garages or mews where – spending a maximum of 25 to 30 minutes per client – she could assuage their sexual needs. Ian said they had arrived a little after 7pm, and even though a blisteringly cold wind howled, it wasn’t long before a car pulled up. It was a small, two-doored, orange Mini, its licence plate unknown. Being tiny, it wasn’t the easiest car for two adults to have intercourse in, but it wasn’t impossible. According to Ian, the man was polite as he discretely engaged Racheal using all the right lingo in this illegal affair; (him) “you busy?”, (her) “no, fancy a date?”, (him) “sure, hop in”. And as was his duty, Ian had a brief look at the man to check he wasn’t dodgy or suspicious, and having given his okay, they drove away. Quite how he could tell if this man was mad, bad, twisted or sinister having barely had a brief glance at him in an unlit car on a dark street, yet he later couldn’t recall the man’s face, as he’d been drinking. By 7:05pm, Racheal was gone, the car having headed north up Westbourne Terrace, either leading to a side street, a mews, a park, or onto the Westway leading to Wood Lane, passed Wormwood Scrubs and up Scrubs Lane, where 12 hours later, Marina’s battered and strangled body would be found. By 7:30pm, he had expected her back, but she was nowhere to be seen. By 8pm, he was getting a bit peeved, as even on a cold night, she could hope to have sex four or five times, and several new punters had passed by. By 8:30pm, he was growing worried as she was never this late. And by 9pm, about the time that Marina had entered the Lion Court Hotel with her client, she’d been missing for two hours. Every time, it must have crossed his mind that she was in danger, but no-one expects a serial killer… …and although one was said to be lurking nearby looking for women, this time she was safe. Just after 9pm, Racheal arrived back on Cleveland Terrace, where he had last seen her. She was unhurt, she was smiling, and she was drunk. Having gone to the pub, she’d spent the money she’d earned on drink, and with Ian being furious, they argued. There was no violence, but as she tried to get into a cab Ian pulled her out and as their angry words reached an impasse, they walked off in different directions. This rift was not uncommon for Ian & Racheal, as they always knew they’d make up and would return to the same vicious circle. Had they made up right then, she would probably be alive today. But although Ian was back at their hostel at 11pm, as seen by eyewitnesses, he never saw her alive again. That night, she vanished a second time. Three and a half miles west, Marina Monti’s body lay dumped in an unlit layby beside Mitre Bridge, it growing ever colder and stiffer, as a faceless man with no known motives drove away in a small car. He had fled, taking her boots, bag and the ligature. Across the night, he had probably washed his car, cleaned his clothes, destroyed any evidence, and gave himself an alibi for the hours he was missing. His method was neither the work of an amateur nor a professional, and yet it didn’t make sense to kill her; he hadn’t raped her, they weren’t seen, there were hints of sadism or perversion (but maybe her boots and her bag were merely missing, having been left in his car by mistake?) and if it was robbery, why would anyone steal from a destitute woman, who had usually spent all of her money on drugs? That night, he might have checked the radio for reports of a woman’s body being found, but with the next day’s newspapers (even the Sunday evening edition) reporting nothing, did he believe he had got away with murder? Did it make him feel braver, did it not fully assuage his sickness, or was he merely a pimp reprimanding one of his street girls, or a drug dealer who was taking more than he was owed? Racheal had vanished… and yet again, by the morning, she was found alive and well. As an alcoholic, she had returned to the warm bosom of booze, having stayed at a friend’s house in West London. On Sunday 25th of January 1987 at about 12.30pm, as the police carted Marina’s body to the mortuary, out of the blue, Racheal phoned John, her father in Oxfordshire, having not spoken in a while. She told him she’d split from Ian, they were living apart, but like the rest of the family, he didn’t know that she was a prostitute. She never said why she called him, but maybe she just wanted to hear a kind voice? Across those next nine hours, again Racheal was nowhere to be seen… …and yet, her final sighting alive would be the epitome of strange. At 9:30pm, Deborah Mezen of Illford, who knew Racheal both by sight and name, saw her enter The King's Head at 132 Edgware Road, just two streets south of Sussex Gardens and Paddington Station. Racheal was said to be drunk, and was sitting with a man she assumed was a punter. Said to be olive-skinned and maybe wearing a ski jacket, it wasn’t him who drew Deborah’s attention. The clothes Racheal was last seen wearing - a black jumper, a blue denim skirt and blue shin-length denim boots with a white stripe – were gone. Instead, she was dressed in a maid’s outfit. Not the kind a sexy French maid would wear in a fantasy, but a cheap, navy blue, hotel maid’s two-piece outfit made of Polyester. It was generic, dull and being one size too big for her, it hung off her bones like a set of rags found in a skip. Described by some as a smock, complete with a purple blouse and a purple hankie in her breast pocket, but oddly possibly no shoes, it looked as if she was here to make the beds and clean the loo. It was so bad, it was laughable, and as Deborah and her friends began to mock Racheal across the bar, known to have a fiery temper especially when drunk, Racheal started to argue. With their fight broken up by the landlord at just before 10:30pm when ‘last orders’ was called – said to be ‘so drunk she was incapable of walking’ – Racheal left the pub carrying a white plastic bag, and was followed by the man. She had vanished twice before in the last 24 hours, but this time would be her last. (End) By Thursday 29th of January 1987, just four days later, detectives appealed for witnesses, they stated they were looking for a “very violent man” and had confirmed in the press “we feel that both cases are linked”. The murders of Marina Monti & Racheal Applewhaite were too similar to be coincidental. They were both young female prostitutes who picked up clients just off Paddington Station, they were acquaintance who were murdered within a day of each other, they had both been beaten, strangled and dumped, their boots, bags and certain items of clothing were missing (and never to be seen again), and both bodies were found in isolated spots far from where they were picked up. With the only difference being that Racheal’s injuries were much more brutal, and some say, deliberately sadistic. Posters were plastered across the city by the Police featuring their faces and the headline of ‘Murder’ ‘do you know them?’. Witnesses were slim, evidence was limited, and with few suspects, it remains a case which is as perplexing even today. Seeking a man with a history of violence against prostitutes, the police questioned (and in some cases arrested then released) several pimps, punters, prowlers, perverts, drugs dealers and addicts, even going so far as to question a security guard in South Africa. The investigation was thorough, so diligent were the detectives in their mission to convict their most likely suspect that is caused an uproar in the Houses of Parliament, upset several embassies, unsettled some precariously balanced diplomatic relations, and led to an intervention by the Home Secretary. Having got a taste for blood, there were more deaths to come, and with one man soon be arrested on suspicion of murder, was he the Vice Girl Killer or was this double-murder just an odd coincidence? Part two of three of The Vice Girl Killer continues next week. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of. Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast - #279 & 280: The Grey Man - Parts 1 & 2 (Philip Joseph Ward)11/12/2024
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
side entrance of 1-3 Hadley Gardens in Chiswick @Googlemaps Sept2021
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond the West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-NINE AND EIGHTY:
Across the morning of Tuesday 11th of November 1941, from 8:50am to 10:20am, an armed man dressed in grey went on a killing spree across Chiswick, Hammersmith and Acton armed with two shotguns. It seemed like he was picking off random people, but having spent months rehearsing and surveilling his targets, his mission had a purpose. Of so he thought.
THE LOCATION:
The locations are marked with a white symbol . To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here. SOURCES:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: of PART ONE Tuesday 11th of November 1941. The Second World War had raged on for two long years and Britain was losing the fight. Still reeling from the evacuation of Dunkirk, German troops were massed at the English channel poised to invade and an eight-month blitz bombing campaign had reduced many cities to smoking and smouldering ruins of rubble, with Hitler’s plan to pummel the British people into submission… only it had failed. For most Londoners, the bombings had become a bit of a nuisance, fires lit up every skyline, guns were commonplace, and with each street tinged with the stench of rotting bodies, they carried on with life. That day was Armistice Day (later known as Remembrance Day and Veteran’s Day), where – with fresh irony – the people marked the end of hostilities between the Allies and Germany just 23 years before, and with a paper poppy pinned to their lapels, at 11am sharp, the city would fall to a 2-minute silence. As a typical middle-class suburb in Chiswick, West London, Foster Road was full of neat semi-detached houses on a peaceful tree lined street, where you rarely heard a sound above a softly spoken whisper. At 8:45am, as per usual, 28-year-old Leslie Ernest Ludford left his home at 11 Foster Road. Dressed in a smart suit and clutching a briefcase, as he worked as a solicitor dealing in divorces and conveyancing. This half-mile walk took twice as long, as being born with dwarfism, this diminutive man seemed even smaller as a curvature of the spine left him with a hunched back and propped up by a pair of crutches. To some, he may have stood out as weak, but as his father always said “it didn’t stop him, as the only thing he couldn’t do was run”. Leslie was well-respected, a keen player of the card-game Whist and was Chairman of the Brentford and Chiswick Junior Conservative Club on nearby Chiswick High Road. As he’d done so many times before, he turned onto Hadley Gardens heading towards Duke’s Avenue. The street was typically quiet; with a few cars parked up and the milkman having done his round, opposite 1-3 Hadley Gardens, Ada Dancy was selling poppies, Arthur Burgess and Matilda Mott were talking to her, Stanley Randall was in his bedroom, and Violet Pender was a few paces behind Leslie. Ada said “I didn’t appreciate the seriousness at the time”, as Violet agreed “I didn’t think it was real”, as having had a gas attack drill days before, they thought it was a practice for if the German’s invaded. But it was real, and Leslie knew it. From in-front of a dark blue saloon, a tall shadowy man raised a single-barrel shotgun to his shoulder, as its sights fixed squarely as the dwarf hobbled on wooden crutches. Stopping dead, with his eyes wide in terror, he raised his hands and Leslie screamed “don’t, don’t”, but the man showed no mercy. Exploding in a fiery burst, a 12-bore shell of lead-shot ripped apart his upper left arm, shattering the humerus, embedding his flesh with red-hot wadding and fragments of suit, as it spun him like a child’s toy. Collapsed and bleeding, as Leslie steadied himself on the wall, he screamed, as a tall man in a grey suit, a grey overcoat and a grey hat reloaded the shotgun and stalked towards him, focussed and calm. As death loomed, breathless and broken, Leslie hobbled to the side gate of 1-3 Hadley Gardens. But with it locked, as he turned, he saw that all that stood between living or dying was man with a gun. The second shot blasted a 2-inch hole in his gut shattering the wooden gate behind and spattering his blood and bits of his undigested breakfast across the path, as Leslie slumped to the ground. Only the grey man didn’t want him scared or injured, but dead, as he fired again from just a few feet away. Crumpled in a bloody heap, the third shot blew a 4 ½ inches hole from Leslie’s groin to his belly button, lacerating his bladder, his intestines, his pelvis, parts of his spine, and with three gaping wounds to his torso which had shredded his left lung, he was slowly drowning in his own blood, acids and toxins. In panic, the poppy seller and two others hid inside 15 Hadley Gardens, but being deaf and having not heard them, Violet Pender walked on. “I hurried along the pavement thinking I would get out of the way and when I got outside of the house, I heard another shot and I felt a pain in my right thigh”. Staggering to the junction of Duke’s Avenue, passersby dragged her into the surgery of Dr Evans, and as the assailant’s car roared away down Foster Road, this usually quiet street descended into screams. Ambulances arrived at 8:52am, two minutes after the call. Violet was lucky, as although suffering wounds to her right thigh and buttocks, with no broken bones or severed arteries just superficial cuts, she was bandaged, stitched and later made a good recovery. But Leslie was ghostly pale by the time the doctor arrived, having lost two pints of blood which was a lot for his tiny frame. And although barely alive, it was as he was driven to West Middlesex hospital that Sergeant Hammond saw his lips move, “I put my head down to him, raising it slightly from the stretcher and I heard him say ‘Brent. It was Brent’”. He then fell unconscious, and died of his injuries. But who was ‘Brent’? The street was littered with evidence, as beside Leslie’s scattered and bloodstained crutches, five empty shotgun shells were found with their shiny brass-caps bearing the words ‘Eley & Kynock’ and ’12 bore’. But having been passed from person-to-person, any hope of finding a fingerprint was lost. The same was said of the killer’s description, as although Police interviewed the six living witnesses, they could all remember was the gun, the blasts and the fear, but not him. Said to be tall, of average build and in his 20s or 30s, dressed in grey and with his face hidden by a grey Trilby hat, he was a Grey Man in every sense of the word, he was forgettable, as all agreed “I doubt I’d recognise him again”. What baffled Police most was the lack of motive. Leslie’s killing was deliberate, but why target him? By all accounts, he was a pleasant man who lived a quiet life with no debts, enemies or secrets. Being unmarried, he had no jealous lovers. Being a staunch Conservative, he had no Fascist leanings. Being a little dull, he played cards, but never for money. And given the era, he wasn’t a suspected German spy or a British double-agent, as owing to his disability, he was declared unfit for serve in the military. Violet’s shooting seemed random, as she only knew Leslie by sight, she knew no-one called Brent, yet if he’d tried to kill her for being a witness, why didn’t he kill those who had huddled in a nearby house? What was certain was that Leslie’s killing was deliberate, and given his unique look, it wasn’t a case of mistaken identity. With witnesses seeing a dark blue Hillman Minx parking up just minutes before, as planned, the killer had waited, targeted and gunned Leslie down in cold blood. He knew where Leslie lived, and he knew his route and timings having kept surveillance on him in the days and weeks prior. But who was ‘Brent’, and why did he want Leslie Ludford dead? A small clue was gleaned from the scene, as although terrified, Matilda had memorised the licence plate of the car - GGC83. At 9:10am precisely, as detectives started trawling every garage, showroom and hire company, its details were transmitted to every constable and wireless cars in every borough. With the hunter now being the hunted, the Police thought it was only a matter of time before Leslie’s killer was caught and brought to justice. And yet, before the police and ambulances had even arrived… …the Grey Man had moved onto his next target. Five minutes west, having snuck along the backstreets, at exactly 8:55am, the dark blue Hillman Minx pulled into St Mary’s Grove, another quiet residential street where the middle-classes live in silence. He didn’t rush, he wasn’t indecisive, and he wasn’t prowling for victims to kill, as having rehearsed this, he calmly pulled up outside of a two-storey semi-detached Victorian home at 1 St Mary’s Grove. This was the pleasant little home of two sisters; 58-year-old Annie New, a spinster who lived alone in the ground floor flat, and 56-year-old Emma Jane Crisp and her husband Thomas who lived upstairs, with their flat a little quieter, as during the blitz, their daughter Phyllis had evacuated to the country. Just like Leslie, they seemed an unlikely target, and yet the Grey Man was specifically hunting them. Opposite, Mrs Kimpton saw a car pull up, a tall man in a grey suit and hat get out, he walked up the path towards the door, he rang the bell and gave it three loud knocks. Inside, Annie went to answer it, but with her sister Emma saying “it’s the milkman, I want him”, she beat her to the door. Only when she opened it, no-one was there. She looked, but the milkman was a few houses away, and seeing a newspaper at her feet, it was as she bent to pick it up that she spotted a man sitting in a car’s backseat. With its long barrel perched on the car’s right rear window, from inside, the Grey Man fired. Exploding in red-hot fury, both sisters were shot with the first blast. Partially obscured by Emma, Annie was hit in the right forearm as the lead shot ripped at her flesh, described as a “sharp stinging pain”. Emma had sustained the brunt of a double-barrelled shotgun’s brutal force, as with a 117 wounds to her hand, abdomen and chest, her right kidney and liver were lacerated, her right lung collapsed, and leaving a 14-inch hole in her body, blood flooded her plural cavity, as she cried “I’ve been shot”. Staggering backwards, Annie tried to pull her sister away from the line of fire, but before she could, a second shot shredded Emma’s left elbow, forearm and buttock, leaving 174 wounds and a 10-inch hole. And as calmly as he had arrived, the assailant got back into his Hillman Minx and drove away. Screaming for help, Mrs Calcott called the Police from a phone box and they were there in minutes. Rushed to West Middlesex Hospital, where Leslie Ludford lay dying, Annie was permanently disabled, disfigured and traumatised for life, but despite the surgeon’s best efforts, Emma died at 5:25am. The crime scene was a carbon copy of the first; with the same car, the same method, the same shotgun shells, the same suspect – a tall Grey Man who was vague and forgettable – and similar victims, having no known connection to the government, the military, any political group, or any kind of criminality, they didn’t know Leslie Ludford or Violet Pender, and they had never met or knew as man called ‘Brent’. Yet, this killer had specifically targeted either one or both of these seemingly innocent sisters. It seemed unusually random, only the car’s licence plate led to a likely suspect. Detectives discovered that the killer’s Hillman Minx was a hire car, owned by Queensbury Hire Services and rented out for four days from Sunday 9th November at noon to Thursday 13th having paid a deposit. The renter, a Mr P J Ward, which was suspected to be an alias had supplied all the relevant documents, which it was assumed was either forged or stolen. But the man himself was said to be ‘forgettable’. Records showed that Mr Ward, a vague man dressed in grey, had hired the same car three times prior, in February, April and August of 1941, and over four days, each time he drove roughly 65 miles. He used the right petrol coupons, paid promptly, was never late and the car was never dirty or damaged. With a brown suitcase on the backseat, it was clear he’d been rehearsing his killing spree for months, but what connected each victim, and who was the Grey Man; Mr Ward, ‘Brent’, or somebody else? Having left an address on the contract, again the hunter was the hunted, as Police used every resource to find this armed assassin. But before they had arrived at the double shooting on St Mary’s Grove… …again, the Grey Man had moved onto his next target. Two miles east, having driven through the narrow backstreets of Hammersmith to Ravenscourt Park, at 9:05am, barely 20 minutes after the shooting Leslie & Violet and 10 minutes after Emma & Annie, the killer’s Hillman Minx was slowly heading north along Westcroft Square towards Hamlet Gardens. Out of her flat at 34 Westcroft Square, 36-year-old showroom assistant Kathleen Guyver left to post a letter. By all accounts, she was an ordinary law-abiding singleton with no known connections to crime, anything sinister nor any of the four earlier victims, and yet it was clear that he was targeting her. William Porter, a road sweeper and Nellie Heath, a neighbour saw the same car, driven by a tall man in a grey suit, enter via the east as if he was heading towards her home and park up in Hamlet Gardens. Kathleen didn’t stop, turn or change direction, she showed no fear or apprehension, instead she calmly walked along the right-hand path on her pre-planned route. But as she passed the car… (bang) from two metres, the muzzle of a double-barrelled shotgun exploded, blasting two holes in her left side. Seeing the car pull away, neighbours said the blast sounded like an exhaust backfiring, but it wasn’t until they saw Kathleen stagger and blood pour from her side, that they realised she had been shot. Rushed to DuCane Road hospital in Shepherd’s Bush, a 1 ½ inch gunshot wound to the left wrist was surrounded by an outer ring of lead shot, which splintered her radius. A second gunshot had narrowly nicked her abdomen and left a 3-inch wound on the inside of her right forearm. But miraculously, with the corner of her handbag completely blow off by the first blast, and a fountain pen and a pencil blown into pieces, this had saved her from more devastating injuries, disability, and maybe even death. Taken to DuCane Road hospital, Kathleen made an almost full recovery. Like so many others, she could only give a vague description of her assailant “30s, dark hair, I cannot describe him further and I do not think I would know him again”, and she denied knowing anyone named ‘Brent’ or Mr Ward. So, was he a stranger, or was this a sinister code of silence by those too afraid to utter his name? That morning, 74 miles north-east in Suffolk, Police burst into his lodging at Newmarket, some clothes and a suitcase was missing, but shotgun shells of the same type were found. Said to be 6ft tall, mid-20s, slim, balding, and always wearing the same grey suit and hat, the landlady only knew him as Philip Joseph Ward. She knew very little about him, and said he was quiet, polite and kept to himself. When detectives looked into his past, they discovered that Phillip Ward was a Private in the 317th Searchlight Battery stationed in Newmarket, having been assessed as ‘Grade 1’ on 15th July 1940. His Commanding Officer described him as efficient and quiet but very much “the grey man” of the unit. Given training as a rifleman, that week he was on 7 days leave, as he had three times prior that year. Almost no-one knew him, not his colleagues nor the lodgers, with the landlady remembering “every week, he received a registered letter. He is very secretive and has never given any information about himself”, but his parents did live in West London, and his last known address was a lodging in Chiswick. Some people knew him as Ward, one man knew him as Brent, but most people didn’t know him at all. So, why was he targeting this group of seemingly unrelated victims? If indeed he was? With every officer alerted to find the car, as the Police raced to his West London lodging, detectives were getting closer to apprehending the Grey Man. Only, before they had arrived at the last shooting… … the Grey Man had moved onto his next target. Two mile west, having driven in an odd zig-zag pattern across Chiswick and Hammersmith, at 9:15am, the Grey Man pulled up at 4 Bollo Lane, a two storey Victorian terrace beside the Piccadilly and District Line tube. He knocked, rang the bell, and waited, but his victim wasn’t in. Half an hour earlier, he’d done the same as neighbours had seen him, but with Mrs Henrietta Sell, a 52-year-old housewife and mother-of-three out doing her shopping, his plans had now been scuppered twice… or so he thought. Trailing her shopping basket behind her, Henrietta was strolling up Bollo Lane just three minutes from her home, when the Grey Man spotted her. She didn’t know his face, his car, and as he parked up outside of the Fairlawn Café, she assumed he was just another customer heading in for a cup of tea. She wasn’t afraid, worried, or suspicious, so much so that she didn’t even see the muzzle of his shotgun poking out of the driver’s window, as all she would remember was the flash, the blast and the pain. Two shots shattered her left arm, as from a few feet away, the fiery explosion blew off her left thumb at the joint, it eviscerated the soft tissue of her palm, and it severed the humerus at the elbow, so as she staggered into the café, her lower arm dangled and flapped, held together by tendons and skin. Collapsing in shock and blood-loss, Henrietta screamed “the Germans, the Germans have shot me”, and as customers ran to get towels to stem the bleeding, Henry Gaskin & Henry Saville dashed outside. Seeing a grey shadowy man driving away in a dark blue saloon, Gaskin boarded Savile’s truck. Flooring this six-wheeled beast, they sped up Bollo Lane towards Acton Town station with the choking fumes of the accelerating car growing ever closer. But as the truck approached the level crossing, the warning lights flashed, the gates closed, and as the train sped through, the truck braked and they lost him. Like most victims, trauma had scrambled Henrietta’s memory, as all she could recall was “everything happened suddenly, I didn’t see his face. I just remember a long black gun and then everything went blank”. Rushed to Acton hospital, miraculously she survived, but her arm had to be amputated. Once again, a dangerous mass-murderer was unleashing a killing spree in West London. Henrietta Sell had been specifically targeted just like the others, and yet, she didn’t know ‘Brent’ or a Phillip Ward. That morning, Police raided his lodging at 78 Barrowgate Road in Chiswick. As a large three-floored boarding house owned by Jessie & Edith Burrows, Mr P J Ward had stayed at ‘Garthowen’ four times that year, and always for four days. He carried a brown suitcase, he often sent a large truck head of him, he had no guests, no calls, and spoke to anyone. Said to be softly spoken, he was no bother, he always paid on time, he never talked about himself and he was easily forgettable. It was no coincidence though that the home of his first victim, Leslie Ludford was just one street south. In his room, Police found the paperwork for a 12-bore double-barrelled shotgun bought for £26 & 7 shillings on 24th of January 1941 from J Rigby & Co, and 8 weeks before the killing spree, a single barrel 12-bore knock-about shotgun for £4 & 5 shillings from the Midland Gun Company in Birmingham. Both were paid for in cash by P J Ward, delivered to Troop 3 of 317th Searchlight Battery in Newmarket, and as hunting rifles, they were powerful but precise weapons used for shooting at distance with accuracy. As expected, his suitcase was missing, but in his trunk were a selection of recent receipts showing that this very organised man had prepared not just for a single hour – in which he had already murdered Leslie Ludford & Emma Crisp, seriously injured Violet Pender & Annie New, and left Kathleen Guyver & Henrietta Sell on the critical list – but that he had meticulously planned at least two days of killing. He had a passport, 7 torch batteries, 4 packs of cigarettes, 10 chocolate bars, several bottles of ginger beer, 1 pack of tea, 5 bars of soap, gun oil, a cloth, a pack of safety pins, a ball of rubber bands, 2 fancy dress masks, and a knife and chopping board showed that he had made enough sandwiches to last. So far, he had only fired 10 shots all with deadly accuracy, but in total, he had purchased 200. ‘Brent’, Ward or whatever he was really called was hellbent on annihilating a cabal of conspirators who had wronged him, and finding two memo pads dated October 1939 and September 1941 in which Leslie Ludford was repeatedly named, it was clear that he had been planning his attack for four years… …and now the Grey Man’s day of reckoning had come. Tuesday 11th of November 1941. Armistice Day. At precisely 6:45am, he awoke in the single bed of the ‘Garthowen’ lodging house. He washed, dressed in his grey suit, grey overcoat and grey Trilby hat. At 7:30am, he ate a modest breakfast of powdered eggs, toast and tea and quietly read the newspaper. At 8:30am, he bid the landlady a ‘good day’ as he carried a brown suitcase to the garage, and moments later, he left in a hired dark blue Hillman Minx. No-one saw him leave, or suspected he was about unleash a devastating massacre. His victims were strangers to each other, but still bitter after four years, those he had killed were just the beginning. The concluding part of The Grey Man continues next week. UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: of PART TWO Tuesday 11th of November 1941. Armistice Day. The Grey Man’s day of reckoning had come. 8:50am, Leslie Ludford was murdered in Chiswick as Violet Pender was shot in the legs. 8:55am, Emma Crisp was gunned down on her doorstep, with her sister Annie on the critical list. 9:05am, Kathleen Guyver narrowly escaped her execution in Hammersmith. And 9:15am, housewife Henrietta Sell had her arm blown off in Acton and was lucky to still be alive. Two dead, four injured, over three miles in 25 minutes. Armed with 200 shotgun shells, a tank of fuel, a fast car, a forgettable grey suit and enough food to last two days, his killing spree had just begun. Having outrun a truck on Bollo Lane and with armed officers hunting him and his car, any other mass-murderer would have fled. Being calm and calculated, there was no hesitation in his actions, as he wasn’t randomly killing strangers, but specifically targeting those he’d kept surveillance for months. And although he was a wanted man, he headed 1 and a ½ miles south, and back towards Chiswick… …as the Grey Man moved onto his next target. 9:25am. Grove Park Road, two streets south of Emma’s murder and three streets from his lodging, the dark blue Hillman Minx drove along this quiet residential street. It was empty, except for one woman. 24-year-old Winifred Allenby strode confidently from the supply depot of the Women’s Auxiliary Air Force at 24 Hartington Road. As an Aircraft Woman 1st Class, Winifred wore a very identifiable uniform of black shoes, tie and stockings, a blue skirt, shirt and tunic with gold buttons, and a blue peaked cap. Heading back to her hostel at 66 Grove Park Road, under her right arm was slung a gas mask in a green canvas bag (as was the law), and under her left arm, she was struggling with a bundle of bedsheets. Like every victim prior, she was undertaking a mundane task on a seemingly ordinary day, as with a poppy pinned to her lapel, her only thought was to get her duties done before the two-minute silence. Roughly 50 yards from her hostel, a blue saloon passed by, she didn’t know the car or the driver. Its speed was steady, as just two metres in front of her, it pulled in, as its nearside wheel struck the kerb. She wasn’t scared and she didn’t slow, as Winifred recalled “as I approached, I noticed the barrel of a gun protruding from the passenger’s window, the driver was crouching down taking aim. I stopped”, and with Britain readying itself for the impending German invasion, this was not an uncommon sight. Terror was coming to the Britain’s streets, only for Winifred, it would come sooner than she thought. “Actually I thought he was going to fire at the house. I started walking again and was about level with the rear wheels, when the barrel turned towards me”, as from barely a few feet away, “it exploded”. Blasting her with a force of 2300 foot-pounds, Winifred’s slender 8 stone frame flew hard against the brick wall behind her with the same kinetic energy as if she had been hit by a car at 60 miles an hour. Engulfed in a wall of smoke and a shattered cloud as woollen fragments of blue and grey exploded in a mushroom-like haze, the car calmly sped away, as Winifred lay on the path, silent and motionless. She should have been dead, as that was the assailant’s aim, but fate was on her side. Shaking her head as if she couldn’t believe what had happened, she got to her feet, she felt no pain, she saw no blood, and she hadn’t got a single scratch or cut on her face or body. She had been hit, but she wasn’t hurt. Winifred was lucky, as although the shotgun was aimed directly at her torso, with her carrying several thick layers of woollen bedsheets over her left arm – still smouldering with its lead shot embedded – it had taken the full force of the blast. “So, I went straight to the hostel and reported it to the Police”. Like others before her, Winifred didn’t know a man called ‘Brent’ or Ward, she had no connections to any of the victims, her name didn’t appear in any of the memo pads which were found at his lodging, and although her attack had seemed as random as the others, it was key to the whole killing spree. The Grey Man was angry four years after a cabal of conspirators had wronged him… …they were all connected, they just didn’t know it. ‘Brent’ was an alias, but the Grey Man’s real name was Philip Joseph Ward. Born on 16th of April 1910, five miles west in the working-class suburb of Hanwell; his military experience was brief, he wasn’t a fascist, a Nazi, a mafia hitman, a German spy or a British double agent and he had no criminal record. He was an ordinary boy living in a modest flat at 13 Half Acre Road as one of several siblings to William & Hermia, until aged 12, he was concussed and hospitalised having struck his head against a wall. Prior to that his father said “he was a happy little boy, but overnight became awkward and troublesome”. In 1925, aged 15, having begun complaining of hearing voices and people laughing at him, doctors at Bethlem Hospital said it was “suffering the aftereffects of concussion”, but it clearly something worse. In 1927, Maida Vale Hospital for Nervous Diseases suggested he be committed to an asylum, only his parents were against this. In 1931, after an attempt to take his own life, diagnosed with Schizophrenia (in which he was depressed, solitary and fixated on the idea that there was a conspiracy against him) - with anti-psychotic medications like Chlorpromazine not available until the 50s - being admitted as a voluntary patient at Stone House Asylum, on the 14th of January 1932, he was certified insane. After a year inside, feeling that he wasn’t getting better but worse, Phillip discharged himself without permission and returned home to Hanwell under his parent’s supervision. It seemed the best solution, but over those three years, in their words, “he became unbearable”. He was sullen, violent, and being hopelessly paranoid, he believed his loving family were against him. In 1936, of his own volution, for the sake of his siblings, Phillip left home, but unable to work, his father would send him £2 a week. By 1937, aged 27, he was living alone in a small lodging on Horn Lane in Acton. Given anti-depressants, he didn’t steal, fight or drink, and he didn’t spiral into criminality. Said to be a tall, vague and a quiet man, he kept to himself and was largely forgettable. Being a passionate reader, he was well-educated, and - although he never worked, had few friends and never had a girlfriend - he busied himself with social clubs. To many, he was an insignificant man who breezed through life without a care... …but everyone has their breaking point, and as a paranoid schizophrenic, his would lead him to kill. That year, being only slightly political, Phillip joined the Brentford & Chiswick Junior Conservative Club at 443 Chiswick High Road, seeing it as a good place to meet likeminded people, as it engaged in charity work for local causes, canvassing for their MP, and frequent games of whist. Its chairman was a local solicitor who walked on crutches having been born with dwarfism, whose name was Leslie Ludford. Phillip wasn’t a popular member of the club, in fact few people said they knew him, as being seen as an outsider, he insisted on using the alias of ‘A Ross Brent’, even though everyone knew him as Ward. In a later psychiatric report, he described the conspiracy as “a campaign against me… I was treated in a shameful way… they communicated with each other and made me an outcast and spoilt my life”. It began with his unwanted affections of several female members of the club, especially a young lady called Barbara Newmark. On 6th of April 1937, he wrote in his memo pad of the first time he fell in love with her “she had come up the passage with the burst of a smile and it passed and she grew more and more sober each moment, giving me the embarrassed feeling that she was uncertain of me”, and although she wasn’t keen, by September he sent her postcards daily - we known this as he kept a list. His memo pad was full of fantasy like “once Barbara caught my attention by thrusting some snapshots into my hands”, which was untrue, as she was said to be a timid girl who was betrothed to her beau. With several girls and their parents complaining, the committee were keen to “prevent him from being a nuisance”, so threatening to cancel his membership, Phillip was given a warning, which he took well. Only the pestering of the girls didn’t stop, as one said “it was extremely unusual and offensive stuff”. On the 23rd of November, while playing a game of whist, witnesses stated “Ward suddenly overturned a table and made a dash for Leslie Ludford’s throat”, barking “just because you are a cripple, you think you can do as you like”, and he also struck another committee member as he was being turfed-out. On 30th of November 1937, an official letter was sent by all members of the committee that “we have passed the following two resolutions: 1 – that Mr A R Brent’s membership of the branch be cancelled. 2 – that Mr Phillip Ward’s membership of the branch be cancelled. The two resolutions were passed to avoid any confusion as to the person concerned. And should you endeavour to enter this branch after this date, such steps will be taken by the officers to ensure your removal as they deem available”. And although, across the year, many letter were sent back-and-forth as Phillip argued a moot-point, at the top of every letter from every committee member was written their current home address. That was it. That was the conspiracy. The cancellation of his membership to a meaningless social club. To others, this would have been nothing but a mild inconvenience, but to a paranoid schizophrenic, this so-called conspiracy by at least 30 alleged conspirators was the real reason his life was collapsing. The letters continued and his rage escalated well into the next year, but in September 1939 when the Second World War began and the club was forced to close, with no outlet, his rage could only fester. By 1941, all the committee members had forgotten about Phillip Ward… …but going unmedicated, the Grey Man felt he was due a day of reckoning. Across eleven months, Phillip had planned his killing spree with precision. He’d selected two powerful shotguns which were easily hidden in a suitcase, 200 shells which were purchased legally, he’d rented a fast car having stored up enough petrol coupons, and having kept a detailed surveillance on each committee member’s home, he’d picked the perfect time to kill them, and three times he’d rehearsed. On his first attempt in February he drove 70 miles, in April 65 miles, and by August, he’d got it down to 62 miles. Eliminating the slack, his November attack would be the epitome of efficiency, as with no fuss, he’d drive from one location to the next, until everyone on his hit list was dead or disabled. Allowing for changes, he was so calm, he had even made enough sandwiches to last at least two days. His first victim, Leslie Ludford, was the chairman of the Conservative Club. Others especially those who he said had “conspired against me” were the vice chairs Peter Bulwar & Mr J Brett, treasurer Mr D Moore, secretary Miss Jean Crimpton, as well as committee members Mr Audrey, Lydia Isaacs, Gerald Davidson, Freddie Williams, Christopher Fuller, Miss Lewisohn, Doris Moore, Doris Appleby, Mr & Mrs William Brett, Douglas Thorburn, and Mrs Stacey, who was political agent for the Conservative Party. And yet, so far, across the first hour of his massacre, only one of them had been targeted. At 9:25am, having fled the shooting of Winifred Allenby on Grove Park Road in Chiswick, he drove 4.3 miles northwest on a 17-minute journey to Rathgar Avenue, another quiet residential street in Ealing. At 9:47am, Miss Agnes Hunt, a 60-year-old retired school mistress left her home at 1 Lyncroft Gardens and arriving at the junction of Rathgar Avenue and Somerset Road two minutes later, she saw a dark blue saloon. It’s engine on, fumes spewing from the exhaust, and inside, a lone man wearing no hat. As before, she didn’t know the man or the car, but as she crossed in front of him, he pulled a shotgun up to his shoulder, and having got her squarely in his sights, he fired… (bang)… but missed. Not a single lead shot had hit her, she wasn’t even winged, and as Agnes stared directly at him, she got a good look at his face; “early 20s, balding, clean shaven, dark eyes, sallow complexion, and he looked angry”. Speeding off, leaving her stunned, she called the Police stating “I’d spot him, as I never forget a face”. It was uncertain how he missed or why didn’t take a second shot, but a greater mystery remained. He murdered Leslie Ludford, chairman of the committee for conspiring to cancel his club membership. Violet Pender, it was assumed was an unconnected passerby who was shot because she was a witness. He then shot Emma Crisp & Annie New at 1 St Mary’s Grove, only neither of them were club members. But Emma’s daughter Phyllis (who was part in his dismissal) was and although in 1939 she lived at that flat, having been evacuated to Peterborough, it’s likely that having seen her address on a letter, he hadn’t twigged that after four long years, a blitz bombing and a global war that she might have moved. Likewise, neither Kathleen Guyver, Henrietta Sell nor any of their relatives were club members, but as many members had very little to do with him and visa-versa, having got the wrong address, it’s likely he only thought he’d got the right house, having kept surveillance on someone he assumed was right. His attempted murder of Winifred Allenby was tenuous, as with it believed he had mistaken her for Barbara Newmark - the girl whose complaint led to his dismissal - this made no sense as she had joined the Auxiliary Territorial Service and not the Women’s Auxiliary Air Force. So was this simply a case of mistaken identity, and if so, why did this obsessed man not recognise the girl he claimed to love? Having begun with a cast iron plan, his killing spree was slowly becoming random, as like many others, Agnes Hunt, the ex-school mistress had no known connection to her attacker, the victims or the club. In a later psychiatric report, Phillip stated “the killing of others (all co-conspirators) is justified, as only by such means can the conspiracy be brought home” to those who wronged him. Unable to find those he blamed, as the spree progressed, his schizophrenia created its own logic, and even if those he killed were innocent, in his mind, everyone was part of a conspiracy against him, even when they weren’t. And yet, before the Police even knew about Phillip Ward… …the Grey Man had moved onto his next target. Having left Agnes Hunt unharmed but stunned, the Hillman Minx was driven up Northfields Avenue, along Argyll Road, 1 and a ½ miles north to Bruton Way, another quiet residential street in West Ealing. At exactly 10:10am, it pulled outside of number 33, a two-storey semi-detached house with a garden. Playing in the street, 4-year-old Robert Stubblefield and 3-year-old Geoffrey Thomas saw the car pull up, a tall grey man get out, and barely noticing them, he walked up a neat little path to the front door. This was the home of 57-year-old housewife Edith Amelia Barringer. She didn’t know him, his alias, and neither she, her husband nor anyone at this address had been a member of the Conservative Club. Inside, hearing a knock and the doorbell ring, her day-servant Elizabeth Eames was about to answer it, but believing it was a rep from Mead & Jefferies who were here to repair her radio, she went herself. Oddly, through its smoked glass pane, Edith didn’t saw a man’s outline, as when she opened the door, no-one was there. No-one, except getting into a car’s backseat was a tall man in a grey suit and hat. “Are you from Mead & Jefferies?”, Edith called. “No”, the Grey Man replied “are you Mrs Barrington?”. Her words were the truth, “yes, it is”, and yet, although she wasn’t the right one but a woman with a similar name, in his eyes, he’d found another conspirator, and those three short words meant death. Like a thunder strike, the double gunshots boomed off every window in the street, as hit with a sonic wall of energy, Edith was blown off her feet and slumped in a blooded heap. Through a smoking hole in her coat, a 3 ½ inch gash had been blasted in her abdomen as her steaming intestines protruded. And ringed by 23 lead shots, they’d shattered her ribs, right kidney and embedded in her lumbar spine. With her pelvis full of blood and her lungs collapsing, although she was rushed to hospital, despite the doctor’s best efforts, she died at 11:40am. Another was dead, as across one hour, three were killed, four were critical or wounded, two had miraculously escaped, but only one had belonged to the club. Death had come to West London, and then, as swiftly as it had arrived… …the Grey Man vanished. No-one knew where he went. It was said that he headed to Sudbury Hill and hid in a side-street; eating his sandwiches, drinking a ginger beer and having a smoke. At some point he polished his single-barrel shotgun, and (as a soldier), at 11am, he may have paid respect to the fallen in the two-minute silence. It’s an irony that may have been lost on him, as with a tank of fuel, two shotguns, 187 12-bore shells, and a list in his head of at least 30 co-conspirators he needed to kill, after an hour, he headed north. But with every available officer ordered to arm themselves and head to west, his killing spree would come to a close. (Radio) “All cars, be on the lookout for dark blue Hillman Minx saloon, plate GGC83, driven by a Phillip Joseph Ward, 31, 6-foot, in a grey suit and hat, he is armed and very dangerous”. With so many dead, and fearing so more deaths, the Police were going to stop him - dead or alive. At 11:45am, seen by Sergeant Frostick on Station Road in Harrow, the officer jumped on the running board and tried to ram the car into a hedge, but speeding away, he was thrown into the road. Five minutes later, seen by PS Sutton & PC Cook on Headstone Lane in Pinner, they commandeered a truck and tried to block its path at Brooks Hill, but again, driving recklessly, the car swiftly accelerated away. Then at 12:03pm, three hours into his massacre, a Police radio car spotted him at Stanmore Broadway. Chased down Spur Road, the two cars sped onto the Watford bypass, he swerved a police barrier, but with the police getting the better of him by going the wrong way up a roundabout, they sideswiped the Hillman Minx, ran it into a kerb, and forced it to a dead stop. Through their windscreen, PC Percival aimed a loaded rifle at his head and dragging him from the car, PC Laver handcuffed and arrested him. “Alright, I give in”, Phillip said, and it was lucky that he had, as although he had enough shotgun shells to kill every club member three times over, he was armed with a knife for when he ran out of shots. Held at Edgware Road Police Station, Inspection Ward cautioned him and “I told him I was going to charge him for a man’s murder in Chiswick”, at which he replied “do you mind telling me his name again”, but when told “Ludford, Leslie Ludford”, he replied “I say I am innocent, I do not know him”. But was this an alibi, confusion, or a symptom of his sickness? (end) The next day, Wednesday 12th of November, a line of women booed the van as he arrived at Acton Police Court. Grinning broadly with vacant eyes, beside a solicitor supplied by his father, he stood in the dock to state his name and to hear the charges against him. But when asked how he pleaded, he didn’t understand what was happening, and his only concern was the £37 the Police had confiscated. Assessed by two noted psychiatrists and the medical officer of Brixton Prison, with Phillip Ward said to be hostile, distant, remorseless and constantly speaking of “a conspiracy”, Dr Grierson said “I am of the opinion that he is suffering from Schizophrenia… and that when received, he was insane, that he was insane at the time of the crimes and he is still insane. I consider him fit to plead but in view of the varying moods associated with the disease, I can only express a final opinion on the day of the trial”. It began on Wednesday 21st of January 1942 at the Old Bailey, but with Phillip Ward unable to focus, instruct his defence counsel, and having already been certified insane ten years before, Justice Gerald Dodson QC stated “he is unfit to stand trial and should therefore be detained at the King’s pleasure”. Sent to Broadmoor Psychiatric Prison on an indeterminate sentence, although schizophrenia’s cause is still unknown, inside he got the help and medication he badly needed, and – unable to harm anyone – he spent his days in silence, reading books in his cell, where he remained for the rest of his life. In January 1972, either at Broadmoor or Newbury Hospital, he died aged 61. The massacre of the Grey Man remains one of West London’s worst mass-murderers, yet it is almost entirely forgotten. So before the memories of the dead are lost forever, we’ll spare a thought for those he killed or hurt; Agnes Grace Hunt, Winifred Allenby, Kathleen Irene Guyver, Henrietta Mabel Sell, Annie New, Violet Mary Pinder, Edith Amelia Barringer, Emma Jane Crisp and Leslie Ernest Ludford. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of.
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
the infamous 'From Hell' letter
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond the West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-EIGHT:
Across October and early November 1888, when 'Jack the Ripper' slayed several women in the East End of London, a smaller and largely forgotten sexual sadist was attacking women in Soho in the West End. Masked using a series of baffling distractions, his crimes were made possible owing to the fevered frenzy in the midst of a mini media mania committed in the Ripper's shadow. But who was he, was it a hoax, or did he even exist?
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a teal symbol of a bin just by the words 'Soho' off Wardour Street. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES: a selection sourced from the National Archives and the Metropolitan Archives:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Bourchier Street in Soho, W1; a few paces east from the spot where Captain Ritchie was bricked, a few doors west from the last plea of Henry Hall, a few doors up from the beating of Baby Richard, and the same street as the dog who saw it all - coming soon to Murder Mile. Formerly called Little Dean Street, Bourchier Street connects Dean Street and Wardour Street. As little more than a dark drab alley where the eateries of Old Compton Street park their sticky oozing bins and the frequently soused empty their bladders, for good reason, it’s the most avoided part of Soho. For those who don’t watch where they’re walking, a common items to step on in this street are usually a puddle of piddle, a splat of sick, a splash of gentleman’s relish seconds after a sex show, a used condom (of course), a pair of spoiled trousers, a pineapple shaped butt-plug, dirty syringes and faeces. Yet, these aren’t the oddest things found on this street, as back in November 1888 was found an eye. A human eye, fully intact, red raw from a recent trauma, and bobbing about in an overflowing gutter. Barely yards away, the body of Eliza Shad lay in her bed, recently dead. Only no-one would find her body for days, as with this speck of West London gripped by the panic that an infamous East End killer was stalking the denizens of Soho, they were looking the wrong way at the wrong thing. But why? My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 278: In the Ripper’s Shadow. Three miles east of Soho in the similarly dank and sleezy working-class district of Whitechapel, gossip was forming in the terrified mouths of its inhabitants that a sadistic serial killer was slaying women. Rumblings that something sinister was brewing had begun since the unsolved murders of Emma Smith and Martha Tabram. On the 31st of August, the sadistic killing of Mary Ann Nichols sparked a manhunt for an extortionist nicknamed Leather Apron leading to misinformation, accusation and anti-Semitism. On 8th of September, with Annie Chapman’s body found in the back yard of 29 Hanbury Street, both deaths were connected, some say tenuously. But following the double-murder of Elizabeth Stride on Berner Street and Catherine Eddowes in Mitre Square - half a mile and 45 minutes apart – so desperate were the Police to arrest him and so ravenous were the press for stories, that on the 1st of October, the infamous Dear Boss letter was made public and the name Jack the Ripper would forever be known. With a city in panic, tabloids slathered over the sensation of a serial killer on the loose, especially when George Lusk was posted half a human kidney. And although some supposed facts and alleged evidence was fabricated when the newspaper’s circulation waned, a mass hysteria enveloped the East End and as the petrified public clambered for more, a dark tourism sprung-up as flocks of grisly gorpers dashed to Whitechapel, with it culminating (some say) on the 9th of November and the massacre of Mary Kelly. Whether he existed or not, the idea of Jack the Ripper turned the East End into a frenzy of fear… …and yet, at the same time, a little piece of horror went largely unreported in Soho. It start unremarkably. Friday 5th of October 1888 was typical of most days in Soho. Hours before the dawn-light had cracked the sky and shone a blast of brilliant light on Berwick Street, the costermongers and traders were setting up the market for the day. Being surrounded by slums, hostels and tuppenny lodgings, vendors sold affordable fare for the most impoverished; like bread, eggs and fish, vegetables like potatoes, carrots and parsnips, fruits like apples but nothing exotic, and - being abundant and cheap - oysters. At around 7am, an unnamed Constable who had been patrolling his beat along Wardour Street, turned onto the light bustle of Peter Street, and as he entered the market, his nose recoiled at a horrific smell. So pungent it made his eyes water, this reek of rotten cabbage was enough to make him retch, as in the gutter – swarming in flies who feverishly fed off its decomposition - lay a coiled pile of intestines. No-one thought for a second that it might be human, they just assumed it was animal, probably a pig. It had gone unnoticed and ordinarily it would have been ignored, but with the Constable being a proud local who liked his streets clean, he insisted the cat meat trader, a man called Tam clean up the out-of-date offal from the gutter, even though he had no intestines on sale. Sparking a big old hullaballoo of loud voices, before the festering guts could be got rid of, a pack of hungry dogs had wolfed it down. Tam was given a stern warning, and later released, and that was it. As I said, it started unremarkably, with this side of Soho seeing a few minor crimes that morning, including a watch theft, a broken vase, and at nearby 28 Peter Street, a prostitute called Eliza Smyth claimed she’d been groped in her sleep. It was just an ordinary day in Soho, if anything, it was a bit quiet. Six days later, in the mid-afternoon of Thursday 11th, a group of kids were heard squealing hysterically on the corner of Denman Street and Denman Place, just off Piccadilly Circus. With a local seamstress growing increasingly annoyed by their noise, she was ready to clip them about the earholes, when she saw what they were poking and prodding excitedly – on the spike of an iron railing was a bloody heart. Fresh, red and dripping, everyone assumed it was a pig’s (probably stolen off the market) and with the tale of the intestines having not made it this far, she tossed it in a basement and it was eaten by rats. That day was just another ordinary day in Soho, except a few doors down at an undisclosed lodging, a prostitute nicknamed ‘Swiss Annie’ woke from an overlong sleep, in which she felt unusually woozy, her throat felt sore and her breasts felt tender. Being ashamed, she told only her closest friends. With news of the East End ripper permeating from one red-light district to another, these seemingly insignificant events in Soho wouldn’t be recorded until weeks later, so their accuracy is questionable. But the next one isn’t. Tuesday 16th of October, the same day it was said that George Lusk received the infamous ‘From Hell’ letter and half a kidney, on Sutton Row off Charing Cross Road, human teeth were found scattered, all were bloody with their roots till intact. It caused a commotion, as all were different shades of yellow and brown, many were rotten, but there were too many for a single mouth, some said as many as 50. Two hours later and 40 feet north in Falconberg Mews, a prostitute nicknamed ‘Lady Jane’ or ‘Lazy Jayne’ was found collapsed and semi-conscious, her petticoat missing, her breasts and neck sore, and although she had no head wound nor missing teeth, she also had no memory of how she got there. Jayne Jones (an alias) gave a statement, only it was destroyed when Vine Street Police Station closed. But were those two incidents – the teeth and the attack – connected or a coincidence? With Whitechapel only three miles away, and the name ‘Jack the Ripper’ on everybody’s lips, rumours started to circulate that – maybe – Soho had its own sexual sadist who had already made his first kill. Over the weeks of mid-to-late October 1888, the city saw an unusually cold fog descend and shroud its streets in a choking cloak of impenetrable grey, synonymous with depictions of the Ripper’s London. It is said, although reports were sketchy, that more body parts were found scattered or neatly placed. Monday 22nd, Hanway Place in Fitzrovia, a ponytail was spotted having been hacked-off near the scalp, yet it was bloodless and fleshless. Some suggested an impoverished women was on her way to sell it as wealthy ladies paid a pretty penny for good wigs. Yet, just south on nearby Hanway Street, Emma Jewson awoke in her bed, feeling dizzy, confused with five bruises to her throat in the shape of a hand. But again, was it connected? With domestic violence and drunkenness so commonplace, the Police dismissed this as “a good time girl” who “got what she deserved” from her husband or her punter. Thursday 25th, Baimbridge Street at the back of the old Horseshoe Brewery, a liver was found. Said to be human, although it was impossible to differentiate it from a pig’s, witnesses said it was “wrapped in a woman’s dress”, some said it “sat on a cloth”, and others said it was “near a cloth”. That day, Alice or Anna Dedmun was choked unconscious by a left-handed man in the nearby Horseshoe Hotel. Her liver wasn’t removed, neither was Jayne’s teeth or Emma’s hair, yet rumours spread that the body part belonged to each victim and was a grisly trophy or as a warning to others. And although a plausible reason could be given for each – whether unwanted animal offal, the theft of a barber’s tooth jar, or a simple purchase from a butcher’s stall - it was all about to take a much darker and sinister turn. Sunday 28th, on Flitcroft Street (then called Little Denmark Street), a dirty severed finger was found. Rumours said it had “nail polish” or “a wedding ring”, but with no proof it was a woman’s, we can’t discount that this area of St Giles was full of factories and accidents were commonplace. And yet again, in a doorway at 23 Denmark Place, ‘Minnie’ Jones, a Welsh prostitute was strangled and almost killed. With no memory of the attack, her assailant or the moments prior, her skirt was ripped, she had five bruises to her throat and neck as made by “a leftie with big hands”, she had a missing finger only this wasn’t hers, and yet, a cut had been sliced into her right cheek in the shape of a ‘W’, or two ‘V’s. Again, this could be seen as a coincidence, a remarkable coincidence, if indeed it was true. But could this have been a bizarre distraction by the assailant to draw the public’s attention from his real crimes? It was an era of excitable frenzy, when people wanted to believe that a serial killer was on the loose, or that – as some gossips cruelly suggested - that ‘Minnie’ had done this to herself for attention. Before the murder of Eliza Shad, one more body part was found - a tongue, pinned to a door on Smith’s Court with a note which read “I lov rippin hors” (all badly written and misspelled) with a trail of blood leading through a door, upstairs to an empty lodging. Occurring not long after the Whitechapel double murder and the publication of the ‘Dear Boss’ letter in which its author claiming to Jack the Ripper stated “am down on whores and I shant quit ripping them till I do get buckled”, this could be a copy-cat, a hoax, or maybe it never happened? That’s the curse of attempting to unearth fact when the press and the people are more fascinated by salacious guff or grisly aspects, that the truth gets lost in a quagmire of lies. With the East End Ripper taking all the newsprint, Soho’s seemingly insignificant little sex-pest was barely reported. Recounted weeks and (in many cases) months later, by then, those memories had become hazy and exaggerated. For many, it was uncertain if he was fake, or a sadist hiding in the Ripper’s shadow… …yet that didn’t stop a mini mania from erupting across Soho. By the start of November 1888, as several Ripper suspects were named and blamed with the so-called evidence against them being so flimsy it wouldn’t stand up in a court of law, a similar witch-hunt was underway in Soho, as the easily angered with their own axe to grind set out to accuse any undesirables. As happens when mouths run faster than brains, any man seen with either victim in the hours prior was hounded and anyone seen walking by at the time was said to have been “suspiciously loitering”. One suspect was said to have “had a knife”, only it was later said he was “eating an apple”. One man was said to have been seen “fondling” one of the women, only he turned out to be her boyfriend. And one mysteriously “had his face always covered with a hanky”, yet it turned out he had a winter cold. Seizing the opportunity to stick the boot in on anyone they had a gripe with, abandoned wives blamed their unfaithful-husbands, businessmen blamed their ex- partners, and sibling rivalries exploded into finger-pointing, as anyone with a grudge, used this series of unsolved attacks to settle an old score. Therefore its unsurprising that – even though not one of the women had any memory of her attacker – that a list of alleged “eyewitness” descriptions “by the girls” drifted from street to street with little embellishments added in each retelling. The men they were on the hunt for included “a man in his 20s, average height and build in a black suit and hat”, as lynch mobs love vagueness. “An Irish labourer, 30s, big hands, fat head, scarred and a dirty suit”, as well as xenophobic descriptions like “a drunken Pole”, “a swarthy foreigner”, “a Jew with sinister eyes” and any enemy of the era whether homeless, disabled, depressed or disfigured, the mentally unwell, homosexuals, and those seen as degenerates. In short, the usual suspects for bigots and racists. Some blamed it in Soho murderer William Crees even though he’d been in Broadmoor since 1883, a shooting that month on Frith Street was tenuously linked even though none of the victims were shot, with some saying it was an extortion gang, some said it was a prostitute was taking out her rivals, a corrupt copper doing the job the law wouldn’t allow him to do, and others blamed opium and Absinth. As for the body parts, some suggested it was the work of a rogue mortician, a dodgy undertaker, or a lazy barber (as in that era, for the poorest, a hairdresser was also a dentist and a surgeon). It was implied it was a prank by medical students at the London School of Anatomy on nearby Dean Street, and that it was (somehow) an advert for the new play ‘The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll & Mr Hyde’ which was causing a sensation on the West End stage. But many locals believed it was the tabloid press trying to conjure up a little excitement as had gripped the East End, only being so corny, no-one believed it. Fearing a panic, the Police (said to be under the guidance of local business leaders) were keen to keep a lid on this, as where there’s fear there’s panic. In their favour, the East End Ripper was so infamous that this West End Fondler (and some say, strangler) had hijacked all the press coverage, and with any link between the victim and a body part being so ludicrous, it was dismissed as a mere scaremongering. It died, before it even became a thing. And unlike Jack the Ripper, he wasn’t given a sinister nickname. The problem was (as much as the people wanted a scare story) this wasn’t a series of victimless crimes, as women had been attacked. All were unusually similar, having been drugged, fondled and strangled to the point of near-death, it was said “one had been bitten” and he had escalated to minor mutilation. If connected, someone had deliberately laid a series of distractions as they wanted time with each woman, so it’s possible that – if this was one man - he had chosen them, as this required planning. This frenzy of excitement died as quickly as it arose, and yet, as rumours spread, any new victims found it impossible to be believed, so they didn’t report it. For many women, this was real, but with the myth becoming little more than a joke, many weren’t believed by their own families, let alone by the Police. Only for one more women, this would end in her death. Eliza Shad was a 23-year-old mother-of-one, at least that’s what we think. Said to have been born in or about 1865, she doesn’t appear on any census and she doesn’t have a birth or a death certificate. Conspiracy theorists might decry this as the corrupt elite trying to erase her history to hide a sinister plot, but many records have been lost in office moves, destroyed in the blitz, mistakes made when they were digitised or mis-transcribed when they were first written, and with even official documents like autopsy reports and police files listing a person by their alias, what we know about Eliza (if that is her name) was reported by those who claimed to know her, so must be taken with a pinch of salt. Eliza’s life was the epitome of tragic. It was said, the first sounds she uttered was her wailing tears which echoed down the dark cold walls of a local workhouse infirmary. She wouldn’t remember her father, as before she was born, he had abandoned his wife and children having become a slave to the demon drink and his fate was unknown. As for her mother? She never felt her hug, as like so many women before her, she died in childbirth. Raised by an older sister who was little more than a child herself, she received a basic education and was trained to mend clothes and cook, so at best, she would become a wife or a servant. As far as we know, she never married, so not being seen as a person in her own right, her life went undocumented. Like many of the most impoverished, she lived a hand-to-mouth existence, never knowing if she’d eat that day. Being transient, she never had a home, at best she scraped together a few pennies for a bed in a hostel or a lodging, and at worst, she slept in doorways, sheds or outhouses, shivering in the cold. With no family, it was said her first baby died before it took a breath. The second she had miscarried having been beaten by her drunken boyfriend. And bruised black and blue, her third child was taken by the beadle as she was deemed an unfit mother simply because she couldn’t escape her horrific life. Sunday 4th of November 1888 was a brutally cold day, but Eliza’s luck seemed to be turning a corner. That morning, she went about her usual routine, by going to St Anne’s church for prayers, and having passed 28 Peter Street where a month earlier Eliza Smyth claimed she had been groped in her sleep, she headed to nearby Berwick Street market, where that same day, the festering intestines had been seen. Here she bought bread, cheese and milk, a little bacon and some welks, as in her purse she had enough money to ensure her belly was full. It must have felt odd to be eating as having tried to kick the drink, as a prostitute she would have usually squandered it, but this time, she was able to afford a lodging. It was a big step for an alcoholic, and having paid for three nights board sleeping on a filthy flea-ridden bed made of horsehair and straw in an unidentified lodging house of a Mrs Crowmar, it was something. That night, as a foul wind howled down Old Compton Street, it was said she brought back three men to her lodging on Little Dean Street, and although this dark urine-soaked alley hardly cut a romantic tone, they weren’t here for kissing and cuddling. But was one of them a sadist with an odd obsession? According to the other lodgers, Eliza was discrete, so none of the men were ever seen. No-one heard any cries or screams, as it’s likely she had been drugged. And – if this was true - having laid a bizarre distraction, he had his wicked way with her in the seclusion of her room, and no one was any wiser. On Wardour Street, beside a little path leading to Little Dean Street, a crowd had gathered, larger than usual, as they giggled with grisly fascination at the gory sight before them – a human eye, intact and red raw from a fresh trauma. Having poked it, it plopped into an overflowing gutter where it bobbed. Grabbing it by the optic nerve which dangled at the rear of this bloody bulb, a boy waved it in a girl’s terrified face, and although these spectators laughed, it drew their gaze from something truly sinister. Wednesday 7th of November, three days later, with her rent having expired, the landlady knocked on Eliza’s door and asked her to leave. Getting no reply, she entered and found her cold and dead. (end) Like a carbon copy of previous assaults, Eliza had been drugged so she lay unconscious, paralysed and at her attacker’s whim. Her petticoat had been removed and left neatly folded on a chair. Her breast was exposed and covered in a dried blood which wasn’t hers. And on her thigh was a single bitemark. Again, a small ‘W’ or ‘double V shaped’ cut was found on her cheek, although the police surgeon said it could have been a scratch from the side table. And like the others, with no defensive wounds, her throat and neck was etched the bruises of a left-hander who had taken her to the very edge of death. It seemed as if he liked to play God with these girls, by taking their lives and giving it back, but unaware that having lived such a hard life (barely covered in a sodden blanket as she slept in cold doorways), Eliza had suffered with asthma, and having taken her too far, her lungs were too weak to recover. Dismissed by the police as ‘a possible accident’ by an over amorous lover or punter, being a prostitute who they said may have engaged in indecent acts like sadomasochism, no-one was arrested or sought. And as the last of this series of bizarre assaults over a month of sadistic madness, was this a mistake, was this someone else’s alibi, or the escalation of a wannabe serial killer who had made his first kill? Investigated by Detective Thomas Bowden, the case was wrapped up and filed away as solved. No-one was brought to trial, no-one was even suspected, and it has remained forgotten for 136 years. It is unknown whether he fled, killed himself, was jailed for a similar crime which was never connected, if he was sent to an asylum, or quit owing to the grief that his odd sexual perversion had taken a life. His identity shall remain a mystery, and yet the biggest mystery remains, if any of it was even true. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of.
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
7 Nowell Road in Barnes (as seen in 2019), Copyright @GoogleMaps Sept 2019
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond the West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-SEVEN:
Sunday the 1st of December 2019 was the last time 53-year-old William Algar, a talented jazz trumpeter was seen alive. One month later, parts of his dismembered body were found in his flat at 7 Nowell Road in Barnes, having been the victim of cuckooing by a drugs gang. But who had murdered him?
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a yellow symbol of a bin near the words 'Chiswick Reach' near tyhe lip of the Thames. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES: (some, not all)
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Nowell Road in Barnes, SW13; five minutes west of the killing of George Heath, four minutes south of where Hectorina MacLennan met Reg Christie, six minutes east of the cat ladies, and a short walk from the slaughtered nudes of Hammersmith - coming soon to Murder Mile. Just shy of the River Thames sits Nowell Road, a residential tree-lined street full of two-storey semi-detached houses from 1920s and 30s. As a working-class area, some are pristine and neatly manicured being owned by old timers who lament the days before the ‘scum’ moved in, and the newbies whose garden resembles a tribute to scrapyards, a museum of dog turds, art shaped like a deflated paddling pool and a complete history of every broken fridge, microwave, foot-spa and telly they’ve ever owned. At the top of the road sits a terrace of three houses with No7 on the left. Across the 2010s, this ground-floor council flat was the home of William Algar, a talented trumpeter who was no bother to anyone, and as a kind man who struggled with his mental health, all he wanted was to get back on his feet. Classified as vulnerable, what he needed was help and support, but being isolated and neglected, what he got was a criminal gang who took over his flat, his mind, and who would end up taking his life. My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 277: The Cuckoo. William Hugh Blaise Algar, known as Willy or Blaise, was born on the 10th of August 1966 in the district of Hounslow, where he was raised and lived for the rest of his life. Coming from a good family and being a semi-regular churchgoer, it may seem a cliché, but everyone who knew him said he was lovely, gentle, polite and sweet, with even the trial judge stating “he did not have a harmful bone in his body”. As a child, whereas some struggle to find their place, William’s talent for music shone through, and although basically educated at Chiswick Comprehensive from 1977 to 1984, dedicating his life to being a jazz trumpeter, he later stated he was a professional aged 16. In 1984, he said he graduated from the London College of Music and later studied jazz improvisation at the University of Roehampton. Still only in his teens, having played in a reggae group, in the early 1980s, William had become friendly with the punk (and later gothic rock) band The Damned who were seeking to regain their fame; with Dave Vanian on vocals, Brian James on guitar, Captain Sensible on bass, and Rat Scabies on the drums. Rat Scabies later said “Willy was the trumpet soloist on Grimly Fiendish, what he played was originally the demo, but it was so good that we kept most of it for the single”. He was a 19-year-old professional musician recording with a famous British band, and he appeared with them on the Channel 4 TV show ‘The Tube’, “when we were trying to re-establish The Damned and he helped us to do exactly that”. Released as a single on the 18th of March 1985, Grimly fiendish was the bands biggest hit since 1979, it reached No21 in the UK single charts in April, as well as featuring on the album Phantasmagoria, and on the sleeve, it credits ‘Willy Algar on trumpet’. Yet, those six months were just a brief burst of fame. His talent had peaked as his mental health declined. William later wrote in an online post “I suffered from schizoaffective disorder from Friday night, on the 25th of September 1985”, shortly after it ended, although – as a psychiatric condition with symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, depression and mania – a single event may have triggered an attack, but it’s likely that it had always been with him. The next twenty years of William’s life are as sketchy as his own recollections, as being sectioned and voluntarily treated across the decades in psychiatric hospitals, his mental health was exacerbated by heroin and cocaine. As a dark side of the music scene, drug abuse is too often normalised, having been the muse of the jazz legends he idolised like Charles Mingus, Charlie Parker, Chet Baker & Miles Davis. In May 1995, he married Marguerite Bidmead, but that didn’t last. Being lost and hopeless in an opium poppy haze, two decades of his life vanished in a puff of smoke, and it took until 2005 to get clean, with William later stating “It's 14 years since I stopped gunning the Skag", having also dealt drugs. Being broke, he tried regular jobs – as a kitchen salesman and acting in a Swiss TV Commercial – but his mental health left him unable to cope. Registered as disabled, he was issued a DLA (a disability living allowance) and in 2010, he moved into a ground floor council flat at 7 Nowell Road in Barnes. This support provided help for this vulnerable man in a time of crisis… …but it also made him a valuable target for scum of pure evil. His flat was small but practical, with a living room, a bedroom, a kitchenette and a bathroom, but said to be “messy and cluttered”, it was typical of a single man who lived a solitary existence. Hidden by an oversized hedge, it gave him privacy and shelter, but it also meant that no-one could ever see in. Being unemployed, over the years, he lost contact with many friends. Many moons ago, he proposed to a girl called Gemma, but marriage never materialised. And on the 31st of March 2015, his life took another spiral into dark depression, when a girlfriend died – leaving him forever saddened and single. To fill the emptiness of his days, he was into spiritual healing, he loved reading poetry like TS Elliot, he backed campaigns to rewild hares on the common, but his one true love was music. Saxophonist Bukky Leo said “music was his life. He was a phenomenal player… it’s very rare to find someone with his kind of drive for music” and as a well-respected trumpeter on the London jazz scene, he played jam sessions at the St Moritz club in Soho, the King’s Head in Crouch End and the Silver Bullet in Finsbury Park. His music kept him alive, and it gave him a reason to live, even when his mental health was declining. In 2018, William posted online that he’d had “168 psychiatric ward terms last year”, and although he had listed himself as the Chief Creative at Luckey Records and planned to record and release his own album, again his schizoaffective disorder had left him even more isolated and broke and vulnerable. Retreating online more and more, his Facebook statuses give us a glimpse at the last year of his life. 13th March 2019, he wrote "found out the news my ex-wife died two or three weeks ago", and with him and Marguerite having lost contact, another tragedy was it took a friend to tell him she was dead. 14th March, in capitals, he wrote "I DON'T GIVE A FUCK. I. DON'T. GIVE. A. FUCK. ANY. MORE", all while being sectioned in a psychiatric ward and although on the 19th he wrote “feeling blue as a boy can be”, on the 22nd he was released, and always being kind "I spent £50 on pizza for the boys on the ward”. That year, a friend tried to get him job as lead trumpeter in the West End hit 'Book of Mormon', but it never happened. The sale of his online artwork titled ‘Bubble Wrap Dark Lord’ only got 6 views. He began missing church and drinking “Jack Daniels for breakfast”. And although on the 2nd of April he wrote "bills, bills, bills. Just can't pay", having posted a plea “I am a musician… who has suffered from a schizoaffective disorder. I need support to avoid going through the NHS for over the 50th time, as they don't adequately support my needs”, of the £2000 he needed, his fundraiser raised nothing. But still he played on, at the King’s Head with Lou Salvoni, at The Jazz in N8 with “my good man, Bukky Leo", sometimes a solo on Putney Common playing ‘On Green Dolphin Street’ by Miles Davis, and on 12th of May, “I made £2 from two thoroughly decent old ladies who said that my sound was good". And then, there was four months of silence… …but why? What happened? On the 21st of September 2019, he wrote that his DLA (disability living allowance) was being taken away “which I cannot do without”. Two days later, he posted about Felix, the cat he was looking after for his friend Amber. That same day, the 23rd, he wished everyone a “Happy Equinox! Only another six months and summer will begin”, never knowing he wouldn’t live to see it. He grumbled “the thing I hate about where I live is that everyone has a nice ride, but as soon as you get one, somebody steals it!” but was this a cry for help? And the last thing he ever posted was “Wil B Algar is feeling… happy”. Only he wasn’t. Being broke, although he’d celebrated 14 years clean, William had begun using cocaine and morphine, and just like in the bad old days – to make some easy money – again, he’d begun dealing Class A drugs. Only it’s far from easy. Dealers deal with other dealers, bad people with no morals who refuse to play by the rules, who use violence to enforce it, and by exploiting a weakness, they take what they want. As a 53-year-old unemployed addict who was thin, frail and registered disabled, he was no match for Emeka Kabiru Dawuda-Wodu, a 19-year-old drug dealer who dubbed himself ‘the devil’, and described as cruel, angry and ‘borderline psychopathic’, he was said to be fascinated by very dangerous knives. As a ‘county lines’ gang, Wodu used children as drug runners, and to make it impossible for the police to find them, dealers often cuckoo themselves into the home of a vulnerable victim – his was William. Being an anonymous little ground-floor flat on an unassuming residential street which was hidden by an oversized hedge, 7 Nowell Road had become a trap house, where Wodu and his gang would deal drugs, and fearing for his life, across autumn 2019, there was nothing William could do about it. He was a prisoner in his own home, as day and night, this vicious gang used and abused him for their own gain and amusement, and as a dealer himself, he couldn’t go to the police or ask friends for help. William had nothing left, and he owed Wodu money. But according to eyewitness Philip Ross, the real flashpoint came near the end of November 2019, when it was said that William spoke 'disrespectfully' to Wodu, who retorted “I'm not your bitch... if you keep talking to me this way, I will kill your cat”. It may seem petty, but that’s how these wannabe gangsters are; pathetic, spiteful and cruel, with no rules nor sense of loyalty, they’d steal from each other, lie to save their own skins, and having picked on a disabled man and the cat he was caring for, it was said they “sadistically tortured” it out of spite. Only, for Wodu and his gang, this little beef with William was far from over. Sunday the 1st of December 2019 was a typically English winters day, being bright but cold. Sometime in the mid-afternoon, he was seen cycling along Castlenau, a busy road two streets from his home, and at the Esso garage, CCTV captured him withdrawing cash from an ATM. He was alone. That was the last time he was seen alive. What’s known about his final hours can only be guessed by the evidence. Toxicology showed that cocaine and morphine were in his bloodstream. Wearing the same clothes, with no defensive wounds and blood spattered up the walls of the living room, he was attacked while asleep or unconscious on the sofa. With no signs of a break in, the killer had a key. An 8cm stab wound to the heart had killed him, but there were 20 more stabs wounds, some of which were post-mortem. And yet, hypostasis (the accumulation of blood after death in the lower parts of the body) showed that he was face down when he died, and that he’d been left in that position for days, or even weeks. Of course, the Police could only assume that, as all that was found was his torso and his head. With no witnesses, it’s impossible to tell who murdered William Algar – a man or a gang, as although they lacked the courage to admit to their crimes, the grisly disposal of his body was a different matter. Two weeks later, on the 17th of December, Wodu, 40-year-old Simon Emmons and 19-year-old Janayo Lucima convened what they moronically called a ‘council of war’. In cold winter months, the corpse shouldn’t have decomposed as fast, but having left the heating on, flies were swarming, maggots were festering, flesh had begun to bubble, and soon the upstairs neighbour would be alerted to the smell. Being not particularly bright and the kind of kids who would have benefitted from staying in school, that day, Emmons used his phone to research ‘Can acid dissolve a body?’. In court, when asked, if he’d been inspired by TV series Breaking Bad, especially a scene there they dissolve a body in Hydrofluoric acid, he said ‘no’. And yet, ten minutes later, it was proven he’d typed ‘hydrofluoric acid Breaking Bad’. He also claimed he was ‘pressured’ into visiting the crime scene and thought “I’ll just be cleaning up”. That same day, Lucima went to Tesco’s in Hammersmith Broadway and was caught on CCTV buying bottles of bleach, washing-up liquid, jay-cloths and black bin bags, paid for using William’s bank card. Across the 17th & 18th of December, as the residents of Nowell Road put up their Christmas lights and engaged in festive hymns, Wodu, Emmons and (possibly) Lucima dragged William’s body to the bath. With the taps on, they hacked off his arms, his legs and his head with a Rambo-style combat knife. Again, in court they’d blame each other. Wodu said “I didn’t know he was dead until Emmons told me and said to help get rid of the body. I thought he was joking”. He said, “the sight made me sick. He was cutting him. Blaise was lying on the floor of the bathroom… Simon was severing his legs. I’ve never seen anything like that before. I vomited a couple of times”, which Simon Emmons completely denied. With the limbs wrapped in binbags and bundled into two backpacks and a suitcase, Wodu & Emmons unsubtly struggled to carry the 41-kilos of remains from the flat, down Nowell Road to Lonsdale Road. Having ordered a taxi (using their names) and wrestled it into the boot, the unsuspecting driver was guided by 45-year-old Marc Harding, 40 minutes south-west to Simpson Road off Hounslow Heath. As a dead-end, off the A314 Hanworth Road, with high-rise flats to the left and the empty dark expanse of the common to the right, Simpson Road isn’t the kind of place you stumble across by mistake. You have to know it’s there, and having pre-dug some holes, William’s limbs were buried in shallow graves. Oddly, it was on heaths like this where William loved playing his trumpet… …only now he was part of it, or at least parts of him were. By Thursday 19th, three weeks after his murder, with his head and his torso wrapped in bedsheets and yet to be disposed of, it was as they cleaned the flat of any evidence, that a call came in from a cohort. 33-year-old Zimele Dube, a street dealer in heroin and crack cocaine was angry, as his enemy, 35-year-old Ebrima Cham nicknamed the ‘Brim Reaper’, who had a reputation for robbing others, was bragging about how he had stolen from Dube four times. Described as 'a maniac who carried a gun', Emmons, Dube & Wodu hopped in a car and sped to the flat Cham was cuckooing in at Grove Road in Hounslow. Cham had wronged Dube, but what did they expect from common thugs with no moral code? On route, they WhatsApp’d him, pretending to be addicts looking for score a fix, but they got no reply. At 11:15am, they knocked on his door, but (like William) with Cham being either asleep or unconscious by taking the drugs he peddled, left partially paralysed, he was unable to fight off his attackers as they broke down the door to unleash what was described as a "frenzied attack" and “an orgy of violence”. Stabbed 11 times in the back, arms and chest using a ‘pirate’s knife’ and (possibly) a second weapon, although paramedics were unable to save his life as a deep wound to the chest proved fatal, with Wodu having stabbed an eyewitness who survived the attack, as well as CCTV footage, traffic cameras and fingerprints found at the scene, the witness was able to give a full description, but not their names. In court, Dube & Wodu blamed Emmons for Cham’s murder, and likewise, he blamed them. It was a pointless killing, over a pathetic little beef, which distracted these hapless wannabe gangsters in their clumsy attempt to clean-up the crime scene of 7 Nowell Road. Still being fired-up on fury and high, they forgot to go back, they left it bloodied, and in the living room with William’s head and torso wrapped only in a blanket, it continued to decompose. Their attempt at disposal was entirely fruitless. But although William had been isolated and alone, he was still missed by those who loved him. By Christmas Day, it seemed strange that with William being so thoughtful and caring that wouldn’t call on his 93-year-old mother Mary, he didn’t send any cards, do any gigs or answer his door or phone. With New Year having gone and still no contact, having asked the Police to perform a welfare check, on Thursday 2nd of January 2020, a month after his murder, officers broke in, and through a fug of flies and an unmistakable smell, they discovered his head and torso wrapped in binbags and a bedsheet knotted twice, with his limbs missing, as well as his genitals and his anus – which were never found. With no witnesses to William’s murder and a semi-competent clean-up, the gang might have got away with murder, but with the car used to drive them to Ebrima Cham’s murder spotted on CCTV, that gave the Police enough pieces of evidence and they started to connect one murder to the other. Headed up by Detective Inspector William White of the Met’s Specialist Crime Command, by tracking down the unsuspecting taxi-driver, on Saturday the 11th of January 2020, forensics carried out a search on Simpson Road and Edgar Road, and police dogs identified two shallow graves on Hounslow Heath. Anyone with half a braincell would have laid low having murdered two men, but on Christmas Day, Wodu and the three others cuckooed another flat, they joked about Cham’s killing, they boasted about cutting up William’s body, and on the 3rd of January, Wodu atacked 20-year-old Charlie Hirshman in a petty spate over a cigarette. Repeatedly stabbed, Charlie survived and described his assailant, but was left with “life-altering injuries including breathing difficulties and the inability to ever laugh or smile”. With two other suspects questioned and bailed pending further investigation, Harding was arrested on January 27th, Wodu on February 4th, Emmons two days later, followed by Dube & Lucima. And although, like petty little boys fighting over a toy, they blamed each other, although warned that his phone calls from prison were being taped, Wodu asked his mother to move his Rambo knife from his wardrobe, and he considered pretending to be mad as a defence, stating “I get so mad… it was like something was saying 'Just do it, just do it’''. Only no sane juror would fall for those lies. (end) Across an 11-week trial beginning in May 2021, both murders were tried concurrently at the Old Bailey before Judge Wendy Joseph QC. Deliberating for 34 hours, on Tuesday 15th of August, Emeka Dawuda-Wodu, Simon Emmons & Zimele Dube were found guilty of the murder of Ebrima Cham. In the murder of William Algar, all were convicted of perverting the course of justice, but unable to prove who had killed William, Wodu, Emmons & Dube were found ‘not guilty’ of his murder or his manslaughter. In Scottish courts, the result would be ‘not proven’, which implies no innocence, as these attacks were said to be “extraordinarily vicious beyond anger” and “of borderline psychopathic proportions”. Sentenced on Thursday 17th of August, Marc Harding was given 3 years and 3 months for digging the holes, likewise for Janayo Lucima who was sent to a Young Offenders Institution owing to his age, Zimele Dube to life with a minimum of 28 years and Simon Emmons & Emeka Dawuda-Wodu to life with a minimum of 31 years, plus 11 years and 3 months for Wodu’s attack on Charlie Hirshman. Had it not been for Cham’s murder, they may have walked free or served a ridiculously short sentence. But sometimes life issues its own justice. Just weeks after his release, in what was said to be a spat with a rival, Janayo Lucima was shot and killed on Comeragh Road, two miles from 7 Nowell Road. And who knows how long the others will survive in prison given their bad attitudes and their lack of respect. With no-one held accountable for William’s murder, the case remains opens, and subject to review. As would have been his wishes, William Algar was cremated at Charlton Park Crematorium, it was said his ashes were scattered in a place he loved best, a fund was set up to raise to money for Youth Music, and on 29th January 2020 at The Silver Bullet Jazz Jam, The Bukky Leo Quartet and many of his friends, family and fans paid a “special tribute to Blaise Algar”. He may be gone, but he lives on in his music. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of.
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
9 Goring Way (today) Copyright @GoogleMaps Sept2022
Welcome to the Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast and audio guided walk of London's most infamous and often forgotten murder cases, all set within and beyond the West End.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-SIX:
In the evening of Tuesday 20th of May 1941, 28-year-old single-mother Phyllis Crocker and her 18-month-old daughter Eileen went to bed, as usual. Being 3 months pregnant, Phyllis drank a cup of cocoa to help her sleep, as made by her husband. But little did she know it would make her sleep for an eternity.
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a yellow symbol of a bin near the words 'Greenford' in the west. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Goring Way in Greenford, West London, UB6; two streets south of the fleeing of the bloody butler, two streets west of where Reg Christie met Muriel Eady, and three streets north of the wood where the happy campers befriended a naked satanist - coming soon to Murder Mile. At 9 Goring Way currently sits a two-storey white-washed terraced-house on a quiet residential street. Built in the 1920s as part of the West Ridge Estate, the double-door shows that it’s still split into two small flats as it always was, with one above and one on the ground floor, where tragedy once struck. In the back garden stands a patio where (in the years since) someone’s mum has probably given herself a lobster tan while high on Lambrini, someone’s dad possibly burned the sausages till they’re blacker and more charcoal covered than a coal miner’s winkle, and where someone’s kids certainly squealed that ear-splitting screech which makes every dog shudder and even each deaf people pray for mercy. Back in 1941, as the Second World War raged on, this too was a family home, having been rented to 28-year-old single-mother Phyllis Crocker and her 18-month-old daughter Eileen. At the height of the blitz, it was a deadly place to live, and although every day she risked being skewered by shrapnel or blown to smithereens, this lovely little family would be killed by something much closer to home. My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 276: Killing for Victory. Phyllis knew that life was hard, so to survive, she fought even harder. Bad luck plagued her life from the start, as Phyllis Elizabeth Crocker was born just six months before the brutal ravages of the First World War, which ripped apart her life before she was even at school. Raised in Ilford, East London to two loving parents, Harry & Sarah Crocker, Phyllis’ childhood was blessed with everything a young girl could need; happiness, health, hope, and her future looked rosy. But in a cruel symmetry to her own demise, tragedy struck her life a little after the first full year of the war when she was the same tender age as her daughter-to-be, as aged 18 months old, her dad died. Killed in a car crash at Godstone in Surrey, as the family’s breadwinner, Harry’s sudden demise not only left Phyllis’ mum widowed with a young toddler, but also impacted on her mental state. Wracked with crippling anxiety and depression, life was hard, but being desperate to feed her daughter as the war raged on, Sarah knuckled down and worked her guts out as a nurse, a housekeeper and a landlady. So perhaps, as a role model, that was where Phyllis got her strength and resilience in the face of fear? On the 3rd of September 1939, when the Second World War was declared and millions were terrified by their uncertain fate, 25-year-old Phyllis Crocker was unmarried and nine-months pregnant. With no money and being a decade before the National Health Service, she gave birth to Eileen thanks to a charity, yet with the father being a married man, the name on the birth certificate was left blank. Seen as sinful, many women may have buckled under the pressure to marry any man no matter how dire her situation, but Phyllis had courage and determination. Said to be “bright, jolly and exceptionally nice”, although this was a terrible time to be an unmarried mother - as with few rights, the law was against her - she fought on to ensure that her baby daughter received the best that she could afford. In January 1940, when she wasn’t wrestling with sleepless nights and nursing her 3-month-old at all hours, Phyllis worked on the assembly line of the Hoover factory in Perivale. Seen as a modern vacuum cleaner with a two-speed motor, bag indicators and a lightweight Bakelite hood, it was made using noxious chemicals like phenol and formaldehyde, as well as deadly poisons like potassium cyanide. Life was hard, but she had work, money and a place to live. Then on the 7th of September 1940 at 4am, the Luftwaffe unleashed an 8-month bombing campaign, and alongside the millions of citizens who fled the cities fearing for their lives, the persistent bombing – day and night, with many never knowing if they’d live to see the dawn – this exacerbated her mother’s already fragile mental state, and in a fit of abject despair, she drowned herself in the River Thames, leaving Phyllis alone, and also homeless. With her young life pockmarked by tragedy, even the hardiest of men may have crumbled… …but for the sake of her child, against all odds, Phyllis strived to succeed. By the bleak Christmas of 1940, when not a single light shone upon this city bathed in blackout, Phyllis moved into the ground floor flat at 9 Goring Way in Greenford. Being cheap and with factories nearby, she knew the risks, she wasn’t unsettled by the bombs, and the flat was small but a lovely little home. Every day, she had a cup of tea with her upstairs neighbour Lillian, a local bakery delivered bread, and in her small back garden she soaked up the sun and let her baby sleep, as enemy bombers refuelled. With fresh food in short supply as Hitler tried to starve Britain into submission, as part of the ‘Digging for Victory’ campaign, in her own back garden, Phyllis grew vegetables to feed herself and her beloved little baby, using a rather sturdy wood-handled spade which she stored in a 3-foot-wide coal box. She did everything to protect herself and her child, only death wouldn’t come from the skies. At the factory, Phyllis fell in love with Lionel Watson, a 30-year-old dark-haired well-built man who said he was a recently divorced father of four. When in truth, he was the epitome of selfish and cruel. Lionel Rupert Nathan Watson was born on the 30th of November 1910 in Woolwich, South London, as the second eldest of 7 children to Oscar, a wharf labourer and Ellenor, a housewife. On the surface, it may have seemed as if Lionel was a man who dreamed of being the daddy to a big family, as having married Alice Vera Langley on the 17th of October 1931, by 1936, they had four children of their own. According to Alice, “it wasn’t a satisfactory marriage” for many reasons. Firstly, he wasn’t a man who could commit to work, often being described as “lazy”, “a liar” or “sick”. Secondly, with a history of mental illness in the family, he was admitted to Warkworth House, an asylum in Isleworth in 1934. And again, as stated by Alice, “on account of him going with girls”, he regularly cheated on his wife. Rightly having had enough, Alice said “we separated three times, as granted by Ealing Petty Sessions on the grounds of his persistent cruelty”. As philandering wasn’t his only crime, so was violence. “He used to punch me with his fists, twice I’ve had the doctor out, and I’ve also lost the sight in one eye”. Against any woman he no longer loved, or wanted, Lionel was scum; nasty cruel selfish scum who only thought about himself. Refusing to pay a penny in child support and leaving them to survive on meagre benefits, on the 1st of January 1940, Alice left him, and with the children being evacuated, even his mother said “I found the children in a verminous condition”, being ragged, filthy and malnourished. For now, they were safe from this vile little man… …only one woman had already fallen for his charms. Released from prison in December 1939 having served 18 months for theft, as part of his probation, he started working at the Hoover factory in Perivale, where he met and fell in love with Phyllis. When he wanted to, he could be sweet, coming across as a good man who, claiming to be “divorced”, said he still cared for his ex-wife and missed his children terribly, as in his wallet, he kept their photos. Only what she didn’t know was that Lionel was a liar who gave a selective account of his past, and was only separated, as he refused to let Alice remarry, making her life without him even more of a struggle. As the two dated and Lionel moved into 9 Goring Way, even Lillian, her neighbour referred to them as ‘Mr & Mrs Watson’, and with Phyllis believing that he’d be a good husband to her and a kind father to Eileen, on the 18th of January 1941 at Ealing Registry Office, they married, even though it was a sham. For the first few months, they lived like a happy family, until December 1940, when Phyllis found out that she was pregnant. For many couples, this news would have been a delight, but it wasn’t for Lionel. With four children of his own (not that he saw them), being a (so called) stepfather to hers and with a sixth on the way, he pestered her to have an illegal backstreet abortion and as many did, it went septic. Having miscarried a three-month foetus, on 22nd December 1940, she was rushed to hospital suffering a fever, chills and vomiting, an abdominal pain which crippled her, and vaginal bleeding so severe, she needed a transfusion, and the discharge was so rancid and sulphurous, it was as if her insides were rotting. With her condition critical, diagnosed as ‘sepsis of the uterus’, although a year before antibiotics were in use, having flushed out her womb with saline and alcohol, after two weeks, she was on the mend. To the Police, Lionel would later deny any involvement in the abortion, claiming “she told me she was pregnant. She said she took something and was very ill. She was never the same afterwards though”. But was that a lie, or his alibi? By the March of 1941, Lionel’s love for Phylis (the wife he had bigamously married) had cooled. Like many before her, she was now a woman he no longer loved or even wanted; as having caught a glance, liked what he saw, and started flirting with her at the Hoover factory, a new girl had taken his fancy. 17-year-old Joan Filby was a filer in the machine shop. Said to be sweet and naïve, this child lived with her parents, and although she’d been friendly with Phyllis, having moved onto another job, she wasn’t to know that she’d been fed a lie - that Lionel wasn’t recently divorced, or no longer seeing Phyllis. Homelife at Goring Way was mundane, they didn’t argue, but it was clear that the love was lost. Often, he made excuses that he was working late, out with the lads, or off to see his kids who’d been moved to Eastbourne, when in truth, this 30-year-old wannabe lothario was taking Joan to the cinema. And while still having sex with Phyllis - as being unwed, Joan had refused - a side effect of sex is pregnancy. On the 21st of April 1941, four weeks before her death, Phyllis saw her GP, Dr Stewart, having exhibited some familiar symptoms; a fever, chills, vomiting and crippling abdominal pain. Dr Stewart discretely asked her “have you taken anything for it”, as he suspected an impending septic abortion, but insisting “no” and with there being no bleeding nor sulphurous discharge, it was put down to a stomach bug. Across the month of May, her sickness was oddly intermittent, as sometimes she felt achy and weak, nauseous with headaches and breathlessness, and other times she felt fine - even though she wasn’t. Unaware, many of the symptoms she put down to her pregnancy and her old sceptic miscarriage… …only, for many months, Lionel had been plotting to kill her. In late January 1941 – one month after the abortion and two weeks after their bigamous marriage – Lionel ‘acquired’ from the case hardening department in the factory a small lump of the deadly poison, Potassium Cyanide. To three people he gave three different reasons, all legal, why he needed it: being to destroy ants in his garden, to kill an unwanted dog, and even to clean a bath. In that era, it raised no suspicions, yet its real purpose was one he’d hide from everyone, especially his wife and her child. Tuesday 20th of May 1941 was an ordinary day for Phyllis. In the morning, as usual, she had a cup of tea with Lillian, she dug a strip of soil to grow beetroots and carrots, at 2pm she went shopping (buying some butcher’s bones for the dog of Lillian’s brother who temporarily lived in her garden), at 4pm she did some washing, and at 5pm, Mrs Burgess saw Phyllis & Lionel hang a blanket on the line, as the baby gurgled in her cot enjoying the last rays of sunshine. Being three months pregnant and with it too risky for Phyllis to have another illegal abortion, it looked as if a new baby was on the way whether Lionel liked it or not. And yet, with him seeing someone else, he had already prepared a concoction to cause her to miscarry, and solve all his other little problems. While she was undressing, using a hacksaw and a file, he ground the cyanide down to a fine powder. While she was wrapping her baby in a nightdress and blanket, and bedding her down for her sleep, he was boiling a pan of hot milk, as into one mug, he scraped the clear powder which swiftly dissolved. And while Phyllis kissed her little daughter who lay in the cot beside her, Lionel walked in, grinning like a husband having done a good deed, as he handed the wife he once loved, a steaming mug of cocoa. Dressed in a vest and petticoat, she got in beside him, and (probably supping a tea so he didn’t confuse the cups) they lay listening to the radio, as without any force, she drank the last drink she’d drink. Its slightly bitter taste of almonds masked by an extra sugar and a wee nip of whiskey to help her sleep. Having been sick for months, she often suffered with headaches, nausea and dizziness, so as her heart raced and her breathing became erratic, she didn’t know that she was dying, she didn’t know he’d poisoned her, and as she drifted from woozy to unconsciousness, within a minute, Phyllis was dead. With her skin unblemished and with no marks of violence, no vomiting nor blood, if a doctor enquired, the symptoms would mirror her botched illegal abortion, as no-one would suspect she was poisoned. Barely a day before he murdered her, Lionel spoke to Mr Odell the baker and told him “we don’t need any more bread, she’s going away”, and having paid off the final bill, no-one would suspect a thing. Only his dirty work wasn’t finished. As Phyllis lay there, silent and slowly cooling, in his eyes, one unloved and unwanted woman was out of the way, yet he wouldn’t be free until he had murdered the other, and being an innocent little child with no knowledge of the dangers in the world and the bad men who stalked its streets, she eagerly supped from the same mug her mother had, as the man she saw as a dad sent her to an eternal sleep. And with both dead, Lionel was free. The next day, while his wife and her child lay cold and stiff on his bed, in the factory’s machine shop, Lionel slipped Joan a note which read “well dear, I expect you wonder why I preferred you out of all girls. I have begun to love you”, and asking her out to the cinema, at which he would gift her with a dress and a pair of shoes which belonged to his wife, he ended the letter “with love and kisses”. Joan had no idea who he truly was, and how little he thought of her, as when asked about his feelings towards her, he later said “I just took her out after my wife died to kill time and because I was lonely”. Like his real wife, his bigamous wife, and the girl he said he was seeing, he used women until he needed them no more then he disposed of them. Only the bodies of Phyllis & Eileen would be a real problem. With the dog in the back garden, Lionel couldn’t bury them. Although at the start of the war millions of pets were euthanised, he’d used all the cyanide and it was too suspicious to steal more. And with no car nor any way to move them elsewhere, he hid them under his bed, as their bodies began to rot. It barely took a day before Lillian, the upstairs neighbour, started asking questions why Phyllis hadn’t joined her for her morning cup of tea, asking “Where’s Phyllis? I haven’t seen her today?”. At which she said he turned pale and stammered, “she’s gone away to see her aunt in Scotland”, (Lillian) “it’s funny she left without saying goodbye’, (Lionel) “yeah, well, she went very early, she was in a hurry”. On the 24th, four days later, masked by distant bombers as flames licked the skyline, having wrapped Phyllis & Eileen in bedsheets, Lionel hid their bodies in the coal box. It wasn’t his nosey neighbour or the rancid smell which made him move them, it was a date with Joan and he was hoping to get lucky. Selling off the jewellery, he took Joan to the cinema, and convincing her to come back to the flat, he showed her a photo of what was said to be “his baby” and he gave her some of his dead wife’s dresses. By the 26th, with the dog having gone, Lillian saw Lionel digging under the flagstones in front of the coal box. She called down, “hello, what are you doing, digging for victory?”, chuckling at her little joke, he brushed it off with a brusk “just burying some cabbage leaves”. As by day, he dug a very large hole, and by night, he buried their bodies, scattered it with quick lime, and replaced the heavy flagstones. Every day, he scrubbed them with disinfectant to disguise the smell, and then he got on with his life. But he wasn’t the richest, ust like he wasn’t the smartest, and knowing that an attractive young girl is an expensive hobby to keep, with Phyllis having £43 in her Post Office account (about £2700 today), he tried to bleed it dry, but he got scared when he realised he didn’t know how to forge her signature. By the 15th of June, more than three weeks after the murder, having run out of money, he tried to give Joan more gifts (like his dead wife’s fur coats, a bracelet and a gold ring), but she’d rejected them. She wasn’t suspicious, but she had been warned by the girls at the factory that he’d got a bad reputation. And with the relationship now over, all that remained was a hole, two corpses and a very bad smell. On the 29th of June, Lionel was witnessed again washing the flagstones down with disinfectant, as with the bombs leaving body parts on every street, every resident knew the familiar smell of rotting bodies. It was as familiar as fresh coffee, and although he blamed the drains, their terrible suspicions rose. On Monday 30th of June 1941, while Lionel was at work, Lillian pried up the foul-smelling flagstones with an axe, and digging into a layer of earth and quicklime, “I reached down and felt something soft”. Alerting the Police, Phyllis’ body was found with her baby wrapped in her arms. (End) Detecting traces on the saw and a witness who saw him steal a lump of Cyanide, even after six weeks of burial, so high was the dose, that the pathologist Sir Bernard Spilsbury confirmed it was Cyanide. Arrested at the Hoover factory on Tuesday 1st July, he pleaded his innocence, and using her abortion as a shield, he claimed Phyllis had killed her baby, then herself, and getting scared, he buried them. Tried at the Old Bailey on the 15th of September 1941 before Justice Cassels, he stuck to his story about his mentally ill wife being so sick that she committed suicide and then murdered her own child. But as he stood there, in the witness box, giving his side of the story for three hours, at no point did he act like a grief-stricken widow but as a cold callous man whose every waking thought was selfish and cruel. Witness after witness told of how he emptied her bank account, sold off her possessions, dug the hole where the bodies were found, and just one day after her death, he sent a love letter to his girlfriend. And with Mr Hall, an employee of the Hoover factory confirming “I saw him take the Cyanide, he said he needed it to clean his bath”, with his defence having crumbled to dust, he was as good as dead. On the 18th of September 1941, after a four-day trial, having retired for just 20 minutes, Lionel Watson was found guilty of two counts of murder and was sentenced to death. And although he appealed his case, being rejected, on 12th November 1941 he was hung at Pentonville Prison by Thomas Pierrepoint. His cremated remains were scattered inside the prison, whereas Phyllis & Eileen were given a full burial in Greenford Park Cemetery. Arrogant to the core, in a last letter, Lionel claimed “I'm not afraid to die. I would have gone with Phyllis had not been for my four little children. God bless them all". The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of.
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE:
On Sunday 5th of November 1978, at a little after 5:30pm, two women stood at a bus stop on Sydney Place in Kensington, SW7, waiting for the rush hour bus. Having been close friends for decades, there seemed to be an odd friction between them, and although their issue was of a personal nature, within minutes, one would be a wanted criminal on the run, and the other would be shot dead. But why did Alvada Kooken murder Margaret Philbin?
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a brown symbol of a bin just by the words 'Chelsea' in the middle of the map. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES: (a selection)
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Sydney Place in South Kensington, SW7; five streets north of the Devil’s Child’s home invasion, three streets east of the killing of Countess Lubienska, the epicentre of Guenther Podola’s brutal amnesia, and the same street as the drippy dangler - coming soon to Murder Mile. On the corner of Sydney Place and Onslow Square is a bus stop, Stand HY to be exact. Bus passengers are an odd breed of human (if indeed they are), as bus stops are spots where only cretins with coughs congregate and the lonely stand in the hope someone will talk to them, alongside teens with tinny speakers, drunks with greasy kebabs, brats with gobs as big as their mother’s backside, and an miserly old bag who chastises the driver for his lateness, only to waste more minutes rooting for her bus pass. If only this was a one-way trip to Switzerland, as these are the kind of people the world wouldn’t miss. And yet, a massacre of some of life’s most incompetent wouldn’t be the first murder to occur here. On Sunday 5th of November 1978, at a little after 5:30pm, two women stood at this stop along with a throng of other passengers waiting for the rush hour bus. Having been close friends for decades, there seemed to be an odd friction between them, and although their issue was of a personal nature, within minutes, one would be a wanted criminal on the run, and the other would be shot dead. But why? My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 275: Stolen Womanhood. Some people don’t feel whole unless they marry, some don’t feel complete until they’ve had children, others feel empty when they’re bereaved, yet many are content in themselves. Everyone is different. But how does it feel when you’re no longer physically whole, with a ‘real’ piece of yourself missing? Alvada Ruth Kooken was born on the 5th of November 1923 as one of two siblings to Alva & Gertrude Kooken, alongside her brother Marvin. As a smart and forward-thinking family, they gave her a good start in life, and being educated at Downingtown High School in Pennsylvania, later moving from Kansas City in Kansas to neighbouring Kansas City in Missouri, this gave Alvada a taste for travel. Raised during the Great Depression - in the 1930s, when a woman’s role was solely as a homemaker - she came into adulthood during World War Two, and with millions of men fighting overseas, women like Alvada became vital part of industry, experiencing jobs and freedom like they never had before. When the war was over, some women went back to their old lives and old ways, but for others, it lit a fire under their backsides to live their own lives, rather than as a man’s appendage. They wanted their own money, their own home and - as a new breed of career women - to make their own decisions. Getting work as a secretary in the US Navy, the fallout of the war and the subsequent conflicts of the Cold War, Korea and Vietnam led Alvada to see the world. With much of her work classified, we can only get a hint at her exciting life from her movements; in 1947, she boarded the ‘Willard A Holbrook’, a US ship transporting refugees from Bremerhaven to New York, in 1948 she lived in Paris, in 1949 she was back in Kansas City to see her beloved family, and in 1956 she caught a Pan-Am flight to London where she continued working as a senior secretary at the US Naval Headquarters in Mayfair. As a government employee with a long illustrious service, Alvada was respected and earning £8000 a year - in an era when the average UK male earned barely half of that - she had achieved her goals and was living in her own flat in Basildon Court at 25 Devonshire Street in an exclusive part of Marylebone. But for every success, she was forced to make a sacrifice. Said to be 5 foot and 5 inches high, Alvada was a good-looking lady who was always neat, well-dressed and elegant. With collar length blonde hair tied back in a ponytail, startling blue eyes, and a pleasant face, which – devoid of wrinkles - always made her look younger than her true age, she was softly spoken with an accent which hid her past but accentuated her love of history, culture and travel. Everyone who met her said she was “likable, but a bit intense at times”, especially as she watched her friends get married and have babies - whereas for her, it was not to be. It was never said why, maybe it didn’t fit her grand plan, maybe she didn’t meet her Mr Right, or maybe it just didn’t happen? But for the rest of her life she would be cruelly defined as a spinster, as if being single was somehow a sin. In May 1963, when Alvada was 40, her mother died. As expected, it hurt her heart, it ached her soul and it left her with a sense that something in her life was missing. Whether a coincidence or not, that year, she started seeing a psychiatrist (one who came highly regarded from a slew of professionals on nearby Harley Street) and she would continue seeing him when she got low for the rest of her life. Thankfully, although miles from home and often feeling alone, when she needed a shoulder to cry on, the ones she trusted most with her secrets were her closest friends; Betty Stuckey & Margaret Philbin. Born on the 1st of September 1933 in Romford, Essex, Margaret Helen Philbin known as Peggy was the daughter of a housewife and a retired civil servant, with her brother a bank clerk. Like Alvada, she was raised with an ambition to succeed and having met while working for the US Government in Paris, said to be inseparable, Margaret and Alvada would become best friends for more than twenty years. It was a perfect friendship, and as two single women, they balanced each other out. They ate together, holidayed together, sometimes they double-dated, and were like a couple - only without the bad sex, the silent loathing and the arguments over who put the bins out – they always remained close. As a woman of routine, the porter at her apartment said “Margaret was quiet, a perfect tenant”, and a bubbly lady who enjoyed her life, never got upset and made the most of every moment. Said to be ‘pretty and popular’, into her mid-40s, although Margaret was childless, for her for it wasn’t an issue. Her loyal friendship kept Alvada happy and stable… until a medical incident changed everything. In May 1976, in her Marylebone flat at Basildon Court, Alvada hosted a dinner party for her boss and his wife. It was a small but elegant affair for a few senior dignitaries, with fine food, soft lighting and smooth music. Knowing how important it was for her career, as a good friend, Margaret helped out. By all accounts the party was a great success, but during the meal, Alvada was taken ill. With her face profusely sweaty and pale, and with her vomiting, it was believed to be food poisoning. But with her gripped by abdominal swelling and an intense pain in her gut, it was later suspected to be appendicitis. Rushed to The London Clinic, two streets away on Devonshire Place, Alvada could afford to go private, and therefore the doctor she paid for was the best. And when I say ‘the best’, I mean ‘the very best’. Her doctor was the distinguished consultant gynaecologist and internationally respected obstetrician, Dr George Pinker, Sir George Pinker to be precise; who for decades had been a consultant at St Mary's, the Middlesex, Bolingbroke, Battersea, Radcliffe, the Soho Hospital and the Samaritan Hospitals for Women, he assisted in the first Caesarean birth under epidural, he was president of the British Fertility Society and supported the research (three years later) which led to the birth of the first test-tube baby. Considered an expert, he pioneered many practices seen as standard today, and as the gynaecologist to Queen Elizabeth II, Sir George delivered nine royal babies – breaking with tradition by insisting they be born in a hospital – they included Peter & Zara Phillips and Prince William & Prince Harry. Said to be kindly, charming and courteous, for his services he was made a Knight of the Royal Victorian Order. If Alvada was to trust her body to anyone, it was to be Sir George Pinker, and that’s who she got. Assessed as an abdominal infection, although she’d had no prior sickness nor diseases in her family, it should have been cleared-up with antibiotics, but the swelling and bleeding persisted and it got worse. Consulting another surgeon, it was determined that emergency surgery was essential, Alvada was told of the risks, informed that – given the spread of the infection – that sick and healthy organs may need to be removed, and she signed the paperwork. Everything was done in accordance with the guidelines. In surgery, with the infected organ identified, “as a possible source of later infection if it was left in”, with the patient’s prior consent, he removed her appendix, uterus, fallopian tubes and her ovaries. It potentially saved her life and prevented further abdominal infections, and as a 53-year-old singleton who was already menopausal, she hadn’t planned to have a baby, and it wasn’t biologically possible. When she awoke, she felt sore, yet with the antibiotics working now the infected organ was out, her swelling was down, she didn’t feel sick, and being on the mend, she would be sent home to recuperate. For the first time in a month, Alvada felt bright and hopeful… …but at her bedside, told that her womb had been removed, her world came crashing down. She said “I didn’t want a hysterectomy. I know it sounds foolish for someone of my age to feel that way, but women do have children in their 50s. I knew he had taken out something that was healthy and normal, and I told him ‘you’ve made a mistake’. He tried to impress me with jargon so I got up and left”. Audrey Whiting, a friend who lived in her block said “she couldn’t think or talk about anything else”, as - in her eyes - a vital piece of her body had been ripped out and her womanhood had been stolen. Biology had been against her, she didn’t have a man to impregnate her, and now with her last chance at being a mother gone forever. Alvada later told the court “I had no feeling. I was dead inside”. Whereas once she was driven, the judge later described her as “a lady of impeccable background who worked throughout… only to become utterly and quite suddenly changed”, as whereas once she was whole, now she had a hole, a gap where her womb once was and – she felt - her future should be. By day, through misty eyes, she watched the women whose bumps she envied, but by night, as she clutched her pillow, she cried herself to sleep to the ghostly wails of the baby who could have been. In one swift slice – at least to her – her body was rendered empty, and hollow, and useless, a husk. Descending into insomnia and despair, although she’d put on weight prior, it was only now that she felt disgust when she looked in the mirror. Once she was young and feminine, and yet with her youth having abandoned her, what looked back at her was an old, bloated and sexless mess. But only to her. Audrey said “she blamed the dinner party, and with Margaret” – her younger, prettier, more popular and fertile friend - “having helped her, this led her to believe she was to blame for the whole thing”. It seems preposterous and it was, but maybe it’s no coincidence that Alvada’s father had died the year before, and with both parents’ dead, unable to face the truth, her mind sought someone to blame? In her head, Alvada believed it began with a clandestine call, in which “her friend had connived with a surgeon to have her ovaries unnecessarily removed”, even though Margaret wasn’t her next-of-kin. Nothing her friend said would convince her of the truth, as all Alvada could think of was the surgeon who stolen her womb and the woman who (she said) had arranged it, maybe out of spite? And with the two falling out, and never speaking again, even though Margaret moved to a new job as a secretary with a shipping company, this was not something that Alvada would ever forget… or even forgive. In August 1978, two years later, Margaret was sent a long and rambling letter in Alvada’s handwriting containing a list of thirty people involved in this conspiracy against her, who she believed had poisoned her at the party and plotted to rip out her womb. The list included nurses, doctors, friends, family and associates, but at the very top of the list was Betty Stuckey, Sir George Pinker and Margaret Philbin. It was a threat, but unsure if it was an idle threat, as Alvada became increasingly unhinged, that month, Margaret moved to a new flat in Pelham Court at 145 Fulham Road, a short walk from Sydney Place. For weeks, an eerie silence grew between them, only that threat wasn’t idle. In April, six months prior, Alvada had concocted a deadly plan. Having acted as if nothing was wrong as she wrote memos for the US Navy, across several evenings, she sidled into a series of seedy East End pubs and socialised with unseemly types, making it clear she was looking for a gun. She offered one man £1000 saying it was a present for her father. To another, she said it was only “to frighten two friends”, but neither wanted anything to do with it. And although they gave statements to the US Embassy, with Alvada having purchased a .38 revolver and 50 bullets, that all came too late. Sunday the 5th of November 1978. Guy Fawkes night, an annual celebration of the terrorist plot to blow up the Houses of Parliament, and either burn, maim or kill as many politicians as possible with a naked flame and barrels of gunpowder. At her flat at Pelham Court, in an ironic twist, Margaret was hosting a dinner party with fine food, soft lighting and smooth music. Only this time, no-one would fall sick, and no-one’s womb would be stolen. At around 5:30pm, with her guests having left, Margaret got herself ready for a night out at a fireworks display (and maybe to meet the man of her dreams who would become a lover, a husband and a father to her many children). Wearing a grey suede skirt, a red and yellow blouse and a brown fur coat, she descended the lift, exited the double doors of 145 Fulham Road, and headed to the nearest bus stop. As always, the night was bitterly cold as a biting frost gripped the air, a low fog clung to every surface, and with a frisson of excitement and reckless stupidity, it was as thrilling as it was annoying. From any and every corner, catherine wheels whizzed, shooting stars popped, and rockets banged, as with her ears echoing to the cacophony of booms, pops and flashes, the streets were also wreathed in smoke. It was the perfect night for fun… but also a murder. Nearby, for several hours, Alvada had lain in wait for her former friend, watching the double doors. Whether a coincidence or not, that day was Alvada’s 55th birthday, and although she was only a year older, maybe it was a reminder that she was still unmarried and forever childless, or a treat to herself? Dressed in a long grey coat and a headscarf, Alvada kept her distance as she followed Margaret across Fulham Road into Sydney Place. She later said “I didn’t intend to kill her. I wanted to hurt her because I knew she was the instigator of the whole thing. I knew I couldn’t sue her for what she had done”. The street was bustling with kids, couples and families on their way to a bonfire. Margaret had no idea she was being followed, until suddenly she felt eyes burning into her like red hot coals. “I saw her. She saw me. I knew she was frightened because she quickly crossed over”, then she stood at the bus stop. They hadn’t spoken in two years. They hadn’t seen each other since. “I followed her along a street and stopped behind her as she paused under a streetlamp”. To everyone else they were just two faces in a crowd, waiting for a bus, with one of them - Alvada - clutching a white and blue plastic Pan Am bag. Alvada said “she did not speak and I did not speak to her. I was waiting for something to happen”. It was something which – in a rational mind – would never happen, but - in an irrational mind – must at all costs. “If she had said ‘I am sorry’, I couldn’t have done it”, Alvada had said, “but she didn’t”. At that point, “two Spanish women passed. I know it made her bold enough to turn and look at me”, and as she did, Alvada pulled from her bag the revolver, and from inches away “I shot her in the head”. Having slipped the gun into her bag and slunk away into the crowd who’d mistaken that smoke-filled flash and bang for the one of thousands of others that night, with 1 down and 29 to go on her Kill List, next up was to be Margaret’s co-conspirator Betty Stukey and Dr Pinker in his Harley Street clinic. And with that, Alvada had vanished into thin air. Passengers on the No14 bus to Putney saw nothing as it pulled up to the stop. Some got on, but one woman didn’t, and with her being slumped on the cold wet and increasingly sticky floor, it was as she was illuminated by a streetlight, that they saw blood flowing from her mouth, her nose and her eyes as it pooled underneath her, as from the back of her head, the right side of her skull was missing. A passing Police Sergeant gave her mouth-to-mouth for several minutes before a doctor took over. Raced to St Stephen’s hospital, armed detectives stayed by her bed in the hope she could a statement, but she remained unconscious. For hours, doctors fought to save her life, but suffering chronic blood loss, a brain haemorrhage, and with her heart constantly stopping, at a little after 8pm, she died. Her killing was described as “calculating and chilling”. Hunting a “mystery woman in a long grey coat and a headscarf”, her photofit was issued to all police and identifying the victim, the motive wasn’t initially clear. But as the detectives searched Margaret’s flat, finding a rambling letter from Alvada complete with 30 names, one of whom she had shot dead, they realised that this wasn’t an empty threat, but a deadly mission. That night, the next two victims in this so-called conspiracy, Dr Pinker and Betty Stuckey, were placed under armed Police guard, the other 27 persons were advised to go into hiding, and Alvada was declared as “armed and dangerous”. Announcing her name and description at a press conference, Police stated “we need to catch her now, before she kills again”, as she had a history of mental illness, a belly full of hatred, and 49 more bullets. Every place she had lived or worked was checked. Every station and seaport was alerted. Security was tightened at Stanstead, Heathrow and Gatwick. And with a possible sighting at a bus stop on Gallows Corner near Romford, it was thought she may be heading to RAF Lakenheath, where she had friends. Police swarmed the area hoping to arrest her before she shot somebody else … …the problem was that wasn’t her. On the night of the murder, Alvada had planned to kill Dr George Pinker in his Harley Street clinic and Betty Stuckey at her home in Putney, but with the shooting having snarled traffic to a standstill, the No30 bus she needed never arrived, and fearing the Police would catch her, he caught the tube home. Packing a bag, she never went on the run. Instead, having withdrawn enough money, she booked into the Royal Garden Hotel on Kensington High Street, barely one mile north of the crime scene, and hid. On Wednesday 8th of November, while Police were searching airbases in Essex & Suffolk, James Hazan spotted the woman whose face he’d seen in the newspaper exiting the hotel, “I got hold of her arms, shouted for a policeman and made a citizen’s arrest”. And with that, the manhunt was over. (Out) Tried at the Old Bailey, beginning on Monday 9th of July 1979, before Mr Justice Cantley, the jury were asked if this was a coldblooded murder, or manslaughter by provocation. Evidence proved there was no conspiracy, nor any hint, between the respected surgeon and any of the 30 names on her kill list. With Alvada said to be “suffering delusions of persecution and a degree of schizophrenia”, she refused to allow her defence to put forward a plea of ‘diminished responsibility’ owing to her mental state, and with a defence of provocation (caused by her belief that her womb had been stolen by a jealous friend) dismissed by the jury, 55-year-old Alvada Kooken was sentenced to life for wilful murder. Transferred to Broadmoor Psychiatric Hospital for assessment, under Section 72 of the Mental Health Act of 1959, she was given a Hospital Order meaning she could only be released when she was deemed mentally well, and although she appealed her sentence, this was later dismissed. Seven years later, she was still at Broadmoor, while on a supervised day trip to Southsea with other patients, she escaped, hopped on a train and headed to London. Armed guards were posted to Dr Pinker’s home and his clinic, and although again the Police warned “this woman is dangerous. Do not go near her”, she was later found in a meeting room at St Ermins’s Hotel in Westminster, fast asleep. She didn’t rant about killing, and having fled, maybe for a brief moment she just wanted to feel free? On 8th of January 1995, Alvada died of natural causes in Broadmoor, aged 71. Shipped back to Kansas City, she was buried beside her parents in Forest Hill cemetery. Across her life, she’d achieved so much, but with a key piece of her life missing, till her dying day, she blamed it on her stolen womanhood. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of. Murder Mile UK True-Crime Podcast - #274: Immoral Earnings (Mary McCormack & Alfred Nathan Bain)6/11/2024
Nominated BEST BRITISH TRUE-CRIME PODCAST, 4th Best True-Crime Podcast by This Week, iTunes Top 25 Podcast, Podcast Magazine's Hot 50, The Telegraph's Top 5, Crime & Investigation Channel's Top 20 True-Crime Podcasts, also seen on BBC Radio, Sky News, The Guardian and TalkRadio's Podcast of the Week.
EPISODE TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FOUR:
1st August 1970, 20-year-old Mary McCormack of Limerick was found strangled in her ground floor flat at 85 Talgarth Road in Baron’s Court, W14. With no signs of a break-in, the police suspected it was either a client who she let in, or a tenant with a key. But did the Police convict the right man?
THE LOCATION:
The location is marked with a dark blue symbol of a bin near the words 'Kensington'. To use the map, click it. If you want to see the other maps, click here.
SOURCES:
MUSIC:
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT: Welcome to Murder Mile. Today, I’m standing on Talgarth Road in Baron’s Court, W14; four streets from the coldblooded couple, five streets from little Sonia’s killer nanny, a short walk from the bubbling drum of John George Haigh, and the same house as a killing possibly connected to Charles Manson - coming soon to Murder Mile. At 85 Talgarth Road, currently stands a four-storey Victorian terrace house. With steps up to the floors above, it’s still split into flats and bedsits, and looks as rough and dirty as it always did. Situated off the A4 Flyover, its bricks are thick with pollution, and it’s the kind of sordid place you’d expect to see a paedo hunched over his laptop, or a van of immigrants manhandled inside for sex-work and slavery. It has a squalid and unsettling feeling, and for good reason. In the early hours of Saturday 1st August 1970, in the front facing ground-floor flat of 85 Talgarth Road, a 20-year-old prostitute called Mary McCormack was found strangled. With no obvious break-in, her killer was either a punter who she let in, or her alleged pimp with his own key. But what was the truth? My name is Michael, I am your tour guide, and this is Murder Mile. Episode 274: Immoral Earnings. What follows is based on the declassified court records and eyewitness testimony. According to the police, their prime suspect in the killing of Mary McCormack was Alfred Nathan Bain. Born on the West Indian island of Grenada on the 19th of June 1941, he was raised in ‘a sun-kissed paradise’, but according to Alfred, his childhood was “unsettled” as his parents “were always fighting”. With Grenada being Crown Colony, and later, an Associate State of the British Commonwealth, seeking a better wage, like many, in April 1960, 19-year-old Alfred Bain swapped the sun, sea and assurance of his homeland for a better wage in England. Only it was hardly the ‘utopia’ he’d been promised, as it was always raining and cold, the food was bland and unpalatable, the streets were ravaged by race riots, and many flats or B&B’s still had signs in their windows which read ‘no blacks, no dogs, no Irish’. Later stating “I drifted”, training as a mechanic, he said that in 1961 he was a greaser at Metropolis garages in Barnes, in 1964 at Blue Star in Fulham and in 1965 at HR Owens on the Old Brompton Road, although this couldn’t be verified as they hired staff on a cash-only basis. He said he was also a window cleaner and managed a record shop, again unverified, and from August 1968 onwards, he worked as a taxi-driver using in his black Wolseley saloon (registration 5832MG) which was prone to breakdowns. Police suspected the history he gave was lie and although he only had one previous criminal conviction for receiving stolen goods –a handbag - on the 1st of January 1969 he was fined £8 10s and as a first offence was given a conditional discharge, but the Police believed he was a pimp, which he denied. 1970s Britain was an era when some police officers were unashamedly racist and openly corrupt, and with Alfred being black, it’s likely he would have been seen as a criminal, even if he wasn’t, and an easy target to convict with a predominantly white jury – but this isn’t to say he was innocent or guilty. Just as, when a brothel was raided, those women wouldn’t be seen as exploited sex slaves in need of help but punished for being a prostitute - but that isn’t to say the Police were innocent or guilty. This is a complicated case marred by bias on both sides, and too often the victims are forgotten, so the testimony you’ll hear will be the words of the women who accused him of selling them for sex. Linda Chinnery was 15 years old, when in July 1968 she got a job at Dollis on Oxford Street. Stealing a purse, she was given two years’ probation, but as a typical teen, she hated reporting to her probation officer and having been sent to an approved school, she absconded, and hitched a lift to London. At a pub in Fulham, this homeless child was introduced to Alfred Bain and the two became acquainted. Linda testified “a white man came… Alfie took the man aside, when he had left, Alfie told me he had arranged that I was to have sex with the man. I was a bit ashamed, but thought I’d get some money”. As a child prostitute charging £10 a time, “I kept £5 and bought a dress”, and other times, “Alfie said he’d save the £5 for me” - this being a trick many pimps used to keep their girls under their control - “and suggested it would be an easy way to make money”. Being unaware of the consequences, soon this vulnerable young girl was being violated by between 3 to 10 drunk and strange men every day. In 1971, Alfred was convicted of “procuring Linda Chinnery to become a prostitute and also knowingly living wholly or partly off her earnings” between the 15th of September and the 30th of October 1969. But his (alleged) control of these girls was said to be more than just manipulation and coercion. Susan Collette who also testified said, “Alfie put Linda on the streets. He threatened her the first time, but after that, she went out with Alfie without an argument”, as for many prostitutes, the fear of the ramifications if they didn’t do as they were told was more terrifying than the consequences itself. Given a blonde wig and the street name of ‘Karen’, at 79 Shirland Road in Maida Vale – a four-storey terraced house which Alfred denied owning but said he sublet it into flats for the landlord - Linda saw “lots of men, mainly white, coming to the house”. Adverts were placed in phone boxes advertising a ‘model’, with details of her age, her hair colour, her size and that she offered ‘personal services’, as well as a phone number which led directly to the front ground-floor bedroom at 85 Talgarth Road. Alfred also denied owning that building, even though he had a room on the ground floor, which Linda said was so he “could keep an eye on them”. By the autumn of 1969, Linda was the tenant of what was said to be a brothel and where she contracted Trichomoniasis, a sexually transmitted infection. When questioned, Alfred denied that he ever beat the girls, only Linda’s testimony contradicted this. Linda said “after one man left, I found that £5 was missing. I panicked. I was frightened, because of Alfie’s reaction. He told me if this sort of thing happened, there would be trouble for me”. And fearing his anger – which Susan Collette witnessed stating “Bain was angry that Linda had double crossed him” - she packed her bags in the dead of night and fled. It is uncertain if she went to the police, or not. Linda was safe, but with a loss of income to the man who used women as a commodity… …her disappearance (it was suggested) lead to the murder of Mary McCormack. In court, Alfred Bain denied he knew that Mary was a prostitute, with his defence counsel Sir Dingle Foot QC stating “there was no evidence that she had been forced to act as a prostitute. This is not a picture of wicked exploitation”, even though he was convicted of “procuring prostitutes” and the one woman he either coerced or forced into prostitution (according to her own testimony)… was his wife. Carmel Keane was from the crime-ridden Southill estate of Limerick in Ireland. Having met Alfred at a party, they moved to London, married in 1965, and with one daughter (Mandy) back in Ireland, at first they were said to be happy and together they had another daughter, Elsina. But with their relationship turning sour – possibly owing to what happened next - Elsina was put into care aged just 3 months. Carmel said “Alfie suggested I should earn some money. He told me that his girlfriend before gave him enough money and that if I wanted to keep him, I’d better do this. He suggested I go on the streets”. This was his wife, the woman he supposedly loved, and yet (she says) he forced her into prostitution. “He nagged me about it and knocked me about, because I didn’t want to do it”. But later convicted of selling his wife for sex between June 1967 and November 1969, she said “I was working in Hyde Park”. Picking up at least 3 men a day, he’d drop her off in his unreliable black Wolseley saloon, he'd park up nearby to protect her (as she was his income), and she earned £50 a day “none of which I ever saw”. Upon his arrest, when assessed by the prison psychiatrist to see if he was fit to stand trial, it was said “he has an inflated view of himself as a lover”, he admitted he is “possessive in his attitude to women”, and “was proud that the women he married was willing to” in his words “sell herself to men for him”. By Christmas 1969, just two months after Linda had fled, Carmel walked out and returned to Ireland. It’s plain to see why the Police saw Alfred as the most likely suspect in Mary’s murder, as even before we get to the evidence of the case, he openly abused woman as a commodity to make himself money. A friend of Linda’s was Valerie Kemp who said that Alfred had suggested to Keith Appleton (Valerie’s boyfriend) that she become a prostitute and that he’d “benefit financially if she did”. In February 1969, realising she was pregnant - perhaps out of kindness, although it’s unlikely - Alfred arranged an illegal abortion using a man of questionable experience called Cosmo Ashley. Cosmo had a bag of surgical tools (a specular, a dilator, some rubber tubing, and a medical book), but being a part-time engineering student and just a hospital porter with no medical qualifications, he had only a rough idea what to do. Nicknamed ‘Dr Lee’, Cosmo stated that Alfred paid him £15 for the abortion, even though it wasn’t his girlfriend who was pregnant, and Valerie said that “Alfie told me to tell Dr Lee that I was sixteen. I was fifteen at the time and Alfie knew this”. But unless she was one of his ‘girls’, why would he do that? According to a later conviction, one of the prostitutes Alfred “wholly or partly knowingly lived off” between at least 4th April and 31st July 1969 was Mary McCormack, even though he would deny this. Like Linda, Mary came from Limerick, and having met her in a bar, after Linda had fled, Mary moved into the ground floor room at 85 Talgarth Road, with adverts plastered in phone boxes advertising a ‘model, 18, 4 foot 11, slim’, with a phone by her bed, and coincidentally Alfred in the room next door. He had known her for six months, later telling the police, “I liked her. I offered her that room. She used to bring men home three times a week. If she did not bring a man home, she would come to me. I had no money from her except rent. She only gave me sex”, denying any involvement in prostituting her. When arrested, hidden in his Wolseley’s floor, Police found two bank books showing that from May to July, he had paid in £475 (£9200), in an era when the average weekly wage was £32 a week, and yet, although he claimed to be a part-time taxi-driver, he refused to say where the money came from. The front room of 85 Talgarth Road was a tragic little place, with pornography on the walls to get men hard, and signs that read ‘smile’ so the girls didn’t forget to act like they weren’t always miserable. So it didn’t look like a semen-coated hell, it had some home comforts like a radio, a TV, a fire and a drinks cabinet, but with those only there to make the male punters feel comfortable, it wasn’t a place to live. Five months into her life as a hole for drunk perverts to pump, this petite leggy brunette was discretely looking to get out, knowing that – like many girls before - this isn’t the kind of job you could just quit. Fearing her pimp’s fury, Rosalind Wright QC said “it is believed Mary was planning to start a new life”, she had hidden £250 (£3700 today) under the carpet, “and she’d enquired about returning to a job at a gin distillery two weeks before her death”. Like Linda, she would vanish in the dead of night, and – unbeknownst to her - with the police keeping surveillance on the flat, she had some protection. But on Thursday 30th July, one day before her murder, with the police stating of Alfred “he came out and looked at us, we thought we’d been rumbled”, the surveillance was stopped, leaving Mary alone. The Police suspected Alfred owing to the holes in his alibi. Alfred said that on Friday 31st of July 1970, “I left at 9:45am. I saw Mary, I said ‘see you later sexy’. I never saw her alive again”, as he didn’t return until 1:30am. He said she was wearing a pink nightie (which cannot be verified), but when her body was found, she was in a black negligee, a peephole bra, knickers, with her hair and make-up done, and her shoes were on the floor as if she’d taken them off. Outside, with his unreliable Wolseley playing up, Alfred said “the starter broke, a man helped me push it to Edith Road”, two streets away, “and I drove it to 131 Percy Street, where it was parked all day”. From 12pm for 15 minutes, he tried making calls to his daughter in Limerick, but couldn’t get through, and being an era of bad telephone communications, it’s likely, but there was no record of the calls. At 2:27pm, he placed a bet as proved by a betting slip, and although he said he did this at 4:30pm, this could have been an honest mistake, and he later agreed with the time when confronted by the proof. At 3:50pm, unable to call his daughter, he sent a telegram from Shepherd’s Bush post office, with the staff refuting this, saying the customer was “a coloured woman, not a man”, but mistakes do happen. From 4pm to 5:30pm, he said he tried booking a flight to Limerick via Aer Lingus, a call there was no proof of, but then, it was the 1970s. And between 6pm and 6:30pm, he said he arrived at Continental Garage on Gayford Road in Hammersmith where his other car - a Simca saloon - was having work done on the body and gearbox, and he stayed there till 10:20pm, which his friends at the garage verified. That day, witnesses saw the following at 85 Talgarth Road. In the morning, a stocky man in a tweed jacket, possibly a pre-arranged punter. Around lunchtime, a late 40s craggy-faced man with grey hair (who was known as a regular client). And an Indian, late 40s, 5ft 8in, with grey hair and a suede jacket who rang her doorbell between 3 and 6pm - none of which resembled Alfred. But a witness said they saw “a black Wolseley outside of 85 Talgarth Road at 6:20pm”. He said his was at Percy Road, 2 miles north-east of the flat and barely a few streets from the garage. But did the witness make a mistake? The witness didn’t get the licence plate, and when asked if this was his car, Alfred stated “no”. At 10:30pm, having bought some off-sale beers, Alfred Bain, his friend Albert Bertrand, and his cousin Clunis Cato, returned to the flat at 131 Percy Road, and tried to get the car’s starter working. Clunis said he saw Alfred several times that day, and said of each occasion, “he was as normal as ever”. This is where the truth deviates, but then, if he was innocent, this confusion could be owing to trauma? Alfred said, with the Wolseley broken, he asked his friend to drive him to 85 Talgart Road. Only Albert denied this, stating “I drove him to 131 Percy Road at midnight”, then he drove himself home. When given this statement, Alfred changed his story, stating he drove alone in his Simca, its gearbox fixed. In his own words, Alfred said “I arrived at 1:15am. I opened (the door) with my key”, as seen by Rene Willoughby who lived upstairs. “I went straight to my room”, right next door, “I saw my television”, which was broken “and I messed with it for five minutes. I then decided to leave it until the morning”. There are no witnesses to what happened next, but Alfred said, “Mary’s radio was playing louder than usual. I peeped into her room. I didn’t notice her”, later stating, “I thought Mary was hiding from me”, possibly for fun, although this was never fully explained. “I went to her room and the telephone was in its usual place, on the floor. I thought it funny that she should go out leaving the receiver off”, which was odd as she was clearly in as her shoes and stockings had been removed and were beside the bed. “I noticed her bag on the floor… I saw a black stocking and that made me more anxious to look for her. I knelt down to look under the bed”, which again is an odd thing to do, unless you accept that she was either playing hide and seek, was caught in the act of something risky, or she was truly afraid of him? Alfred then claimed “I noticed her foot sticking out from under the bed, I grabbed it round the ankle. I shouted ‘Mary’. I quickly moved the bed over to the left. She was on her face and I grabbed her shoulder. I shouted ‘Mary, Mary’, I shook her and turned her over. I knew there was no life in her”. Alfred shouted for his neighbour, Rene, to come down, and at 2:20am, they called the Police… …almost an hour after Alfred said he had entered the flat. With Police securing the scene at 2:25am, the investigation was headed up by Chief Inspector Sayers. What was clear from the outset was that, with no signs of a break-in and the house secure, the culprit was either someone Mary invited in, or a resident with a key. And with her intercom broken, someone may have disabled it to stop anyone being alerted to her punters buzzing in, and then getting no reply. Pathologist Dr David Bowen stated “the body had been on its back for most of the time after death”, as its hypostasis confirmed this, “but then someone had turned her over” as Alfred had reported. Taking swabs from her mouth, anus and vagina, it was determined there was no sexual assault. Taking hair, blood and urine samples, she wasn’t drunk, on drugs, or poisoned. And with no skin scrapings of a suspect under the nails, she hadn’t been scared of her attacker and she didn’t fight for her life. But there was a good reason why? Bruising to the lower lip showed she’d been punched, possibly knocking her out. Rolled onto her front, her killer used his weight to pin this tiny woman down, and with her immobile and helpless, from behind he strangled her. Killed not out of panic but a furious anger, he crushed her larynx, and left a deep bloody groove in her neck, having held the ligature tight until he was certain that she was dead. When the room was searched, her wallet containing £250 to be used for her escape was missing, only with it hidden behind the bar and under the carpet, it was unlikely a stranger had stumbled upon it. Detectives said the murder weapon, which was never found, was likely to be a strip of plastic edging which came off a hi-fi speaker in her room, having belonged to Alfred several months prior. It seemed an odd choice as a ligature, especially if a stranger had chosen to strangle her in the heat of passion. With no witnesses, the evidence was circumstantial. Friends said Alfred was “disturbed and broken hearted” when he spoke of her death, And with Mary’s murder occurring between 12:30pm and 1:45pm, if that is correct, there is an inconvenient gap in Alfred’s timeline when he was seen by no-one; being 15 minutes after he struggled to call his daughter, and 30 minutes before he placed a bet. Arrested that night, detectives were so sure that Alfred was the culprit (rather than one of her clients) it could be said that they were blindsided by the need to prove his guilt. Asked “did you kill Mary?”, he said “no, I’m innocent… the power of truth is in me and I want to help you”. At which, the Sergeant said “you’re a pretty good actor but you sometimes overdo it. Why did you kill her?”. He denied he did. Giving several statements and repeatedly questioned, initially he gave a false testimony, he refused to comment, his shifting story was full of holes, and (against all evidence) he denied knowing Linda Chinnery or Valerie Kemp, he denied procuring an abortion, he denied being a pimp, he denied living off immoral earnings, he denied 85 Talgarth Road was a brothel, or that he prostituted his wife. (end) On the 6th of January 1971, Alfred Bain was tried at the Old Bailey charged with murder and living of the proceeds of prostitution, as well as conspiring to procure an abortion with Cosmo Kumah Ashley. Pleading ‘not guilty’, the prosecution stated he had tried to establish an alibi with lies and inconsistent actions, but with “no conclusive evidence to prove he had killed her”, on the 22nd of January, after five hours, the jury found him guilty of living of immoral earnings, and he was jailed for two years in prison. Unable to prove that he murdered Mary McCormack, a retrial of the charge was ordered, and on the 25th of February 1971, this time using the same evidence, he was found guilty and sentenced to life. Appealing his conviction in June 1972, the judge stated that “the evidence met the legal standard of guilt”, and with Alfred released on licence, he died in May 2001, with his daughter pursuing his appeal. If he was guilty, what couldn’t be agreed on was why he had killed Mary. The Prosecution suggested three motives; that he suspected her of ratting him out to the police (hence the surveillance), that he wanted her money (even though, in his bank, he had vastly more than her), or that, having planned to start a new life, he had strangled Mary in a fit of rage, as he saw women as a disposable commodity. Whether we believe he was guilty or innocent is irrelevant, as the conviction should be based on hard evidence and not opinion or bias, otherwise what is the point of the law. The truth is lost to the midst of time, and what happened in that room only Mary knows, and possibly Alfred, both of whom are dead. The Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast has been researched using the original declassified police investigation files, court records, press reports and as many authentic sources as possible, which are freely available in the public domain, including eye-witness testimony, confessions, autopsy reports, first-hand accounts and independent investigation, where possible. But these documents are only as accurate as those recounting them and recording them, and are always incomplete or full of opinion rather than fact, therefore mistakes and misrepresentations can be made. As stated at the beginning of each episode (and as is clear by the way it is presented) Murder Mile UK True Crime Podcast is a 'dramatisation' of the events and not a documentary, therefore a certain amount of dramatic licence, selective characterisation and story-telling (within logical reason and based on extensive research) has been taken to create a fuller picture. It is not a full and complete representation of the case, the people or the investigation, and therefore should not be taken as such. It is also often (for the sake of clarity, speed and the drama) presented from a single person's perspective, usually (but not exclusively) the victim's, and therefore it will contain a certain level of bias and opinion to get across this single perspective, which may not be the overall opinion of those involved or associated. Murder Mile is just one possible retelling of each case. Murder Mile does not set out to cause any harm or distress to those involved, and those who listen to the podcast or read the transcripts provided should be aware that by accessing anything created by Murder Mile (or any source related to any each) that they may discover some details about a person, an incident or the police investigation itself, that they were unaware of. |
AuthorMichael J Buchanan-Dunne is a crime writer, podcaster of Murder Mile UK True Crime and creator of true-crime TV series. 
Archives
April 2025
Subscribe to the Murder Mile true-crime podcast
Categories
All
Note: This blog contains only licence-free images or photos shot by myself in compliance with UK & EU copyright laws. If any image breaches these laws, blame Google Images.
|
